Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Владимир Владимирович Харламов

Channel

Владимир Владимирович Харламов

@dzrkharlamov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

147subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793250067
TypeChannel
Username@dzrkharlamov
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dzrkharlamov

Growth

14715315010 August 2026 — 153 subscribers11 August 2026 — 153 subscribers24 August 2026 — 149 subscribers9 September 2026 — 148 subscribers18 September 2026 — 147 subscribers10 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:40147-1
9 Sept 2026, 16:20148-1
24 Aug 2026, 16:09149-4
11 Aug 2026, 01:56153no change
10 Aug 2026, 23:47153first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥838.1%
419.0%
🫡419.0%
👍29.52%
custom 545614904921424906014.76%
💘14.76%
🤩14.76%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC14 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @liderdzrPhoto

Сегодня на стадионе «Орбита» состоялся день физкультурника! Наши волонтеры помогали участникам в координации, а на испытаниях создавали ту самую атмосферу праздника. И конечно же, участвовали сами и проходили станции. Спортсмены показали невероятный характер, а разнообразие активностей удивило всех участников — каждый мог найти испытание по душе и проверить свою физическую форму. Праздник удался! День физкультурни

🔥4

2 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @liderdzrPhoto

Волонтёры Молодёжного центра «Лидер» передали на передовую очередную партию маскировочных сетей и антидроновых шторок. Работа идёт постоянно — ребята собираются в центре после плетут, упаковывают, готовят к отправке. Стараются делать всё качественно, потому что знают: это нужно бойцам здесь и сейчас. Такая помощь стала для волонтёров уже привычным делом. Не громким, но очень важным. Каждый понимает, что даже небольш

🔥3👍1🫡1

29 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC58 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Нация, для того чтобы сохраниться, должна собраться в кулак, занять одну позицию, только тогда победим. Надеюсь, что через некоторое время мы встретимся снова, для того чтобы поздравить друг друга с победой. А она будет за нами»

🫡3👍1💘1

27 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

4🔥1🤩1custom 54561490492142490601

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @dzrkharlamov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Владимир Владимирович Харламов” (@dzrkharlamov), 147 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dzrkharlamov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.