Channel
@dzeiy_chanel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002721038440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dzeiy_chanel |
| Description | немного хаоса в эфире |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dzeiy_chanel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 45 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 45 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 691 |
| Reactions total | 58 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
58 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 25.9% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 25.9% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 24.1% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 13.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я понимаю, многим непонятно, зачем я вообще это вчера заснял: коты часто так бьются за еду. Но просто это максимально нетипичное для моей кошки поведение, потому что она всегда к еде, в целом, ровно относилась. Я, конечно, и голодом так ее не морил, как последние два дня получилось, но все же тут явно не обошлось без стимулятора аппетита в составе капельницы для седации 🤪 потому что так активно она стремится поесть т…
🥰6
Video message, posted without a caption
😁2
Video message, posted without a caption
😁2
А вообще сегодня как-то тотально не везёт с транспортом: по пути в клинику единственный автобус который едет от Новочеркасской сюда, и который ждать 23 минуты, подъехал к остановке, даже не остановился и пустой уехал. Потом, благо, через минуту приехал такой же - и уже взял пассажиров. Сейчас тусим на остановке и ждём единственный до зелёной ветки троллейбус... который, судя по информации на остановке, ждать 20 мину…
Иду с кошкой под мышкой (мне очень нравится, как это звучит) к остановке. Нам навстречу едет какой-то мужчина в летах на велосипеде. Я слышу звук "кскскскскскскскскс". Сначала подумал, что это его велосипед такие звуки издаёт. Потом подумал что это он кошке кс-кскает. А потом вспомнил про кэтколлинг. Какой, в жопу, кэтколлинг? Я выгляжу сейчас как сосед-растаман: штаны-алладины, футболка с мемным гусём, красная ненак…
😁6
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥2
Клиника-то конечно крутая, дорогая, многими рекомендуемая, но халатность в выдаче указаний по подготовке к седации присутствует. Вчера мы уехали из-за того что, как оказалось, нужно было сильно больше голодать. Сегодня выяснилось что препарат от давления нужно было отменять за 12 часов до процедуры, то есть в 6 утра сегодня надо было дать эту таблетку... а я дал в 14. Но мы померили давление, оно всё равно оказалось …
🤬1
Мне так нравится в штанах-алладинах ✨ И смотрятся они классно. Хочется ходить в них всегда!
🔥3🥰2
Узбагоин творит чудеса. Все спрашивают: "А не спрыгивает?" или удивляюются: "Какая спокойная". Я сам удивляюсь, когда она без узбагоина чиллит на коленях. Но все же без таблетки ее надо придерживать, особенно в автобусе: там она норовит все исследовать. А с таблеткой вот: она уже уснула у меня на коленях 🥺🤲 #кощка #фото
❤5
Общественный транспорт? Какой общественный транспорт? Действительно, зачем полной остановке людей автобус... Хоть один... Из 5 маршрутов, блт. #фото
😢1
Валяемся, ждём повторной поездки. Сегодня, кстати, спокойнее голод переносит... но может потому что я не ношусь по квартире, а сплю пол дня 😅 #фото #кощка
❤6
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dzeiy_chanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 849,233 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“just saying” (@dzeiy_chanel), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dzeiy_chanel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.