Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DELL’

@dzDell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

528subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002155194099
TypeChannel
Username@dzDell
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dzDell

Growth

528531529.56 August 2026 — 531 subscribers6 August 2026 — 531 subscribers13 August 2026 — 528 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 528–531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:15528-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:31531no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:23531first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

374 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534177875163613311117246.0%
custom 530354747391293997210227.3%
custom 52693938209606957888021.4%
custom 5474483319708080487205.35%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dzDell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 December 2025 to 20 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Mar 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,490 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53417787516361331117custom 52693938209606957883custom 53035474739129399723

20 Mar 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,540 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 534177875163613311115custom 52693938209606957887custom 53035474739129399725

18 Mar 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,970 views35 reactions10 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

16 января 1913 года картина пострадала от трёх ударов ножом, которые нанёс 29-летний иконописец, старообрядец, сын крупного мебельного фабриканта Абрам Балашов, после чего лица изображённых художнику пришлось воссоздавать фактически заново. Хранитель Третьяковской галереи Егор Хруслов, узнав о порче картины, бросился под поезд. 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩запах 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩гари 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩DELL’ 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 Lana Абрам Бала

custom 534177875163613311116custom 530354747391293997211custom 52693938209606957888

15 Feb 2026, 14:14 UTC≈3,730 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Составлю списки на замечательное мероприятие OAO beautiful people 20.02.26 🖤 • Нужны красивые, стильные девочки и мальчики 18+ спб 👉 @dizello *Также ищем фотографов

custom 530354747391293997217custom 534177875163613311111custom 526939382096069578810

20 Jan 2026, 18:53 UTC≈1,940 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @se1ectsPhoto

ᅠ SELECTS ᅠ OPEN WORKSPACE NETWORK 💖💖💖 'The selected ones are those who carry their idea and lead the masses, lighting the way. We are building an empire. We are building our own universe. The idea is unity, to elevate our vision, our decisions, our thoughts, as a light of great knowledge.' ᅠ U can be with us.

custom 53417787516361331117custom 53035474739129399724custom 54744833197080804874

20 Jan 2026, 18:50 UTC≈3,050 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Список фрешменов 2026 Изучайте

custom 530354747391293997211custom 53417787516361331118custom 54744833197080804876

20 Jan 2026, 18:49 UTC≈1,510 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @se1ectsSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53417787516361331116custom 54744833197080804873custom 52693938209606957882

8 Jan 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,910 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📍теперь тут

custom 534177875163613311116custom 52693938209606957888custom 53035474739129399726

8 Jan 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,830 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 534177875163613311118custom 530354747391293997210custom 52693938209606957888

31 Dec 2025, 21:09 UTC≈1,890 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

С 2026 любимые!!!🎄

custom 534177875163613311115custom 52693938209606957889custom 53035474739129399729

31 Dec 2025, 15:00 UTC≈1,870 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

DELL’ 2025✅ 100% ⏳

custom 534177875163613311120custom 530354747391293997213custom 526939382096069578811

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dzDell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 752,178 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DELL’” (@dzDell), 528 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dzDell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.