Channel
@dyakstuff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,543subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002088483503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dyakstuff |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dyakstuff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 2,543 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 2,542 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 2,540 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 2,538 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 2,539 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 2,538 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (29 June 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 7,379 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
113 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 53.1% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 40.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.31% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.885% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Раньше смотрел на оттиски гипсом как на извращение) Теперь понимаю, что это классная тема Честно говоря, даже не знаю других таких курсов, где можно и оттиски снять гипсом, и чеки сделать, и подлитки, и сканы и конструкции все руками покрутить Все-таки на подобном обучении это самое ценное, пусть и на фантоме, но попробовать самому
🔥9❤1
2-й день курса завершен Сегодня разбирали клинические случаи и проходили практику Снятие оттиска гипсом, сканирование с фотограммометрией, фиксация циркониевой конструкции Для себя, к сожалению, пока не вижу перспектив в ближайшем времени делать подобные работы, особенно полностью в цифре 1) Требуется очень плотная связка с хирургом и техником. Определенно должна быть некая фанатичность в хорошем смысле этого слова, …
❤1🔥1
Забудьте, что я вчера сказал про самый удобный стул Как вчера в комментах верно подметили, сидеть на нем долго тяжко- начинает давить на заднюю поверхность бедра. Поэтому седушка минус А вот подлокотники чудесные, я бы себе их взял обязательно. Пусть ломаются через время, но они максимально регулируются, легкие, маленькие Пробовал 2 вида подлокотников Rini- ну вообще не понравились. И так и сяк мне их представитель ф…
💔1
Еще нашел самый офигенно удобный стул на котором сидел пока что. Особенно подлокотники шикарные и по наклону и по форме, поддержка поясницы, в общем пока для меня фаворит Никогда не слышал даже эту фирму, возможно есть подвохи какие-то Называется Support Design
👍6❤1
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
Прилетел в Краснодар на курс Алексея Земана по протезированию на имплантах Сегодня первый день, теория и практика- временная конструкция, трансфер чек, гипсовый оттиск, сканирование, короче разные этапы. Ни разу еще не видел курса по тоталам с таким количеством практики
🔥5
Enamel полировал недавно для видео- жестче блеска не встречал у композита. Вообще по характеристикам он лучший во всем- моделировать только не очень удобно. Ну и стоимость солидная Но если приноровиться-лучший
❤6🔥4
Мне удобнее
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сейчас активно развивается онлайн-формат обучения, в связи с чем вопрос. Вот лично тебе, конкретно тебе, кто читает этот текст- интереснее онлайн-курс с уроками и самостоятельной практикой дома, или посещение мероприятий оффлайн? Онлайн: +не надо никуда ходить +занятия в удобное время +материалы остаются для повторения +дешевле оффлайна -нужна дисциплина -меньше коннекта с лектором -необходимость покупки доп.оборудо…
В пятницу провел свой первый интенсив по реставрации🙂 Изначально планировалось 3-4 часа, но в итоге превратилось в 5.5 часов. Теории было минут 20, остальное время моделировали. Просто не вижу смысла перескакивать с бугра на бугор, если вижу, что еще предыдущий не у всех получился- мы же не для галочки собрались Разобрали полностью моделировку и полировку, моя главная радость, что у всех все получилось по итогу- знач…
❤9🔥2
Пс🗣️ Послезавтра буду проводить практический интенсив на микроскопах в Зумакс-центре. Будет мало слайдов, но много практики🌪️
🔥6
Простая полировка композита отечественными лялями) Хз зачем люди до сих пор покупают резинки по 1000-1500₽/шт, правда🤷🏻♂️
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dyakstuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мне удобнее
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 69,493 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dyakstuff для стоматологов” (@dyakstuff), 2,543 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dyakstuff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.