Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr.Zeman «Ежедневная практика»

Channel

Dr.Zeman «Ежедневная практика»

@dr_zeman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,849subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001540525832
TypeChannel
Username@dr_zeman
DescriptionАлексей Земан. Стоматолог из Краснодара Здесь про протезирование на зубах и имплантах, как оно есть. Со всеми подробностями, наблюдениями, осложнениями! Автор канала @Alexey_Zeman
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_zeman

Growth

9,8159,8499,8327 August 2026 — 9,817 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,817 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,820 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,815 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,820 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,824 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,834 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,849 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 16 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,810–9,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 06:359,849+15
20 Aug 2026, 03:119,834+10
17 Aug 2026, 10:589,824+4
14 Aug 2026, 06:169,820+5
10 Aug 2026, 21:289,815-5
7 Aug 2026, 23:139,820+3
7 Aug 2026, 11:459,817no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:359,817first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 9,849 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held21 (6 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total27,545
Reactions total379
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,720
Videos
232
Links
88

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 57s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

614 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30349.3%
24039.1%
👍518.31%
😍142.28%
🤯60.977%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC865 views40 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

ВИДЕОДНЕВНИК ПУТЕШЕСТВИЯ Экспедиции становятся для нас не просто увлечением, а обретают все больший смысл Постараюсь насчитанный контент отразить в полноценном фильме из путешествия, а пока посмотрите небольшую видеозаметку. PS.: сегодня уже 20 день, как мы в пути. Едем по Кыргызстану PPS.: маршрут: Россия-Казастан-Узбекистан-Таджикистан-Кыргызстан-Казахстан-Россия

🔥2711😍2

16 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,780 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Этапы работы. И представляете - фиксация без коффера 🤯 Сначала боковые 7, 6, 5, затем резцы и в конце 4, 3. Так проще решать вопросы с точной посадкой конструкций при фиксации. Обычно межзубные контакты немного мешают. И вот такие детали: порядок фиксации, работа без коффера, посадка конструкции - решают, сядет тотал с первого раза или уйдёт в коррекции. По отдельности этапы простые. Вся соль в том, чтобы собрать и

18👍2🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,670 views31 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Хватит перекладывать ответственность на зубного техника! 1 видео - рекомендации перед началом работы. 2 видео - рекомендации после препа. Сначала мы наспех делаем пару сканов/слепков и пускаем все на самотек, а потом удивляемся, что форма не та, прозрачка не такая, рот не закрывается и вообще давай по новой, техник виноват 😠 Друзья, зубной техник не обязан читать наши мысли и идеи! Помимо качественных сканов/оттис

21👍6🔥4

14 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,550 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Как отпрепарировать 14 единиц под коронки за 1.5-2 часа? Рецепт такой: берём пол килограмма лапши, пару свободных ушей и приступаем к повествованию. Если честно, я практикую десятый год , бережное препарирование, качественная ретракция и точные оттиски или сканы важнее нескольких сэкономленных минут. Конечно важно иметь смышленого ассистента, а лучше двух, заранее готовить все оборудование и материалы в кабинете и

21

13 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,540 views7 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

В чем секрет точного мокапа? *фрагмент из веба ТОТАЛЫ НА ЗУБАХ Вы же тоже 100 раз видели ролики, где доктор извлекает ключи, убирает ретрактор, и пациент довольный счастливо улыбается у зеркала? Если вы после каждого переноса берёте турбину и сносите все по прикусу просто, чтобы рот, наконец то, закрылся, то это видео для вас: Для начала придется снять хорошие оттиски или сканы и убедиться в точности и повторяемо

7

12 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,580 views24 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Нормально делай - нормально будет. Каждый из этих 4х слайдов отражают всю эту мысль. Ситуация на старте: ортогнатическая хирургия, ортодонтия, имплантация. Ортопедический этап это итог лечения и на нас лежит не малая ответственность. Хотя бонусом именно мы получаем все лавры эстетического результата. Любое тотальное протезирование состоит из простых этапов, но усложняется все обьемом работы и там то кроется МНОЖЕСТ

🔥176😍1

10 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈1,550 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Пациентка обратилась за реабилитацией. Жду вопросов в комментариях, тут есть что обсудить. Если кратко, то: На верхней челюсти невозможно было сохранить зубы. Установили 4 импланта с нагрузкой временным протезом. На нижней было принято решение сохранить 6 передних зубов. В дистальном отделе установили 4 импланта под мостовидные конструкции. Такой случай легко читается постфактум на готовом результате. Но на консу

🔥175

9 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,370 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

3 способа зарегистрировать ЦС в тотале на имплантах ...и один из них позволяет вообще не снимать оттиски 👀 ⠀ Знакомо?👇 Пациент на имплантах, а вы ловите себя на мысли: как поймать соотношение так, чтобы техник потом не «угадывал». Один визит, второй, восковые валики, отдельное посещение - и всё равно нет уверенности, что координаты не поехали. ⠀ В ролике рассказал 3 рабочих протокола: от old school на восковом валик

🔥151

8 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,470 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Немного точности вам в ленту 😍 ТОТАЛЫ НЕ ДЛЯ МЕНЯ. Логичный вывод, когда вы видите ОТДЕЛЬНО выполненные этапы работы, но в голове нет последовательности действий. Вы не понимаете как оценивать риски на диагностике, как переносить мокап и оценивать результат - правильно определили ЦС/высоту прикуса и т.д... 🧠Вот для решения этих задач мы с how to dent и сделали вебинары по тотальному протезированию на ЗУБАХ и ИМПЛА

🔥161👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,550 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Voice message

🎙Как не потерять соотношение челюстей при тотальной реабилитации? ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Идеально зарегистрировал новый прикус, техник сделал воксап, перенёс в мокап, пациенту удобно и красиво. Но впереди обработка 28 зубов, и стоит начать преп как теряем самое соотношение, которое так старательно ловил, необратимо теряется. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ В новом подкасте разобрал 3и рабочих протокола☝️ Для т

👍13😍3🔥21

6 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,960 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔥ВЕБ: ТОТАЛЬНЫЕ РАБОТЫ НА ЗУБАХ🔥 + Бонус ТОТАЛЫ НА ИМПЛАНТАХ ⠀ 👨🏼‍⚕️ Автор: Алексей Земан 🗓️ Запись доступна после покупки ⠀ Программу, бонусы и формат смотрите в картинках к посту 👆 ⠀ 🎓 Мы с How to dent подготовили большой материал для ортопедов любого уровня и тех, кто хочет войти в ортопедию = всем, кто сталкивается со стираемостью, снижением высоты прикуса, комплексными случаями и стоит перед выбором: делать само

12🔥6👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dr_zeman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 39,590 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr.Zeman «Ежедневная практика»” (@dr_zeman), 9,849 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_zeman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.