Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🟡 Business | Виктор

@dvprobiz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

935subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001964068253
TypeChannel
Username@dvprobiz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dvprobiz

Growth

9357 Aug 2026, 11:48 — 935 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:52 — 935 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:488 Aug 2026, 10:52
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 934–936 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:52935no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:48935first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 935 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 January 20264 August 2026)
Views total527
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,397 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,26952.9%
🔥1,05143.8%
❤‍🔥321.34%
custom 5456424794704583026160.668%
🙏130.542%
custom 545624968888792689440.167%
💋40.167%
🤝40.167%
💯30.125%
🤷‍♀10.042%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dvprobiz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC134 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья😍 Пост для маркетологов и всех, кто оказывает услуги в интернете. Сегодня меня развели на 3000 рублей😐 Ко мне в 23:50 обратилась девушка с просьбой удалить отзывы на Яндекс.Картах. Обычно такая услуга стоит от 5000 и выше, но я согласился сделать за 3000. Удалил первый отзыв. Попросил данные стоматологической клиники, которую она представляла, чтобы выставить счёт🤑 А в ответ - «мои услуги стоя

❤‍🔥5🔥5🤷‍♀1

Signed Dressen Viktor

18 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC393 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥15❤‍🔥5👍1

Signed Dressen Viktor

30 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC637 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья 😍 Когда один ответ - это мало 🤔 Задаёшь вопрос нейросети - получаешь один ответ. Может, хороший. Может, средний. Но ты видел только одну точку зрения. Я собрал инструмент который это исправляет. И он полностью бесплатный🤦‍♀️😅 Называется LLM Council - совет из 5 советников. Каждый смотрит на твой вопрос со своего угла: 🔴 Критик - ищет что развалится. Не пессимист, а друг который спасает от пло

👍6🔥6❤‍🔥1

Signed Dressen Viktor

23 Apr 2026, 08:11 UTC611 views82 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья😍 Большинство из вас - владельцы салонов лазерной эпиляции, так что это точно для вас🔥 Моя жена 🌷 записала интервью с врачом-онкологом - они разобрали реальные вопросы по лазерной эпиляции: гормоны, загар, противопоказания и всё такое. Получилось по делу, без воды👍 Думаю, специалистам в этой сфере стоит посмотреть. И если видео зайдёт - оставьте комментарий там, где будете смотреть, это будет пр

👍67🔥9💋3💯3

Signed Dressen Viktor

21 Apr 2026, 10:07 UTC574 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Добрый день, друзья 😍 Если вы управляете салоном, то точно узнаете себя в этом тексте. Все мои клиенты и те, кто проходил аудит, знают: лучшие продажники в мире - это отзывы. Особенно в онлайне. И давайте честно - даже один негативный отзыв может заметно просадить конверсию из заявок в реальных клиентов. Сегодня хочу поговорить именно о негативе🤬 ❗️Первое, что важно принять: негативный отзыв ≠ вас оскорбили. Это

🔥20👍15❤‍🔥2🙏1

Signed Dressen Viktor

7 Apr 2026, 12:39 UTC537 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья😍 Я долго откладывал этот пост. Но раз вы продолжаете спрашивать, что у меня происходит с банком ВТБ - рассказываю И, честно, то, что произошло со мной, может случиться с каждым из вас. 10 месяцев назад мои счета заблокировали по 115-ФЗ. Звучит серьёзно - закон о борьбе с отмыванием денег и финансированием терроризма. Всё правильно, всё логично. Такие законы нужны. Но дальше начинается то, о чё

🔥49👍22🙏12custom 54562496888879268944🤝1

Signed Dressen Viktor

1 Apr 2026, 14:59 UTC501 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый вечер, друзья😍 Возвращаемся к вопросы - в какой области поиск компании статистически выше? То есть, когда человек вводит запрос, куда в первую очередь падает его взгляд - на карту города или на выдачу слева? Я решил найти исследования по этому вопросу. И да - я их нашёл🔥 Они, правда, все на английском🤦‍♀️ но спасибо ИИ - получилось перевести и уловить суть☺️ ➖Как мозг решает задачу😐 Когда человек ищет кон

🔥63❤‍🔥2

Signed Dressen Viktor

1 Apr 2026, 07:35 UTC401 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Когда вы ищете компанию на Яндекс Картах, куда в первую очередь смотрите?

  1. На список слева (название, рейтинг, отзывы)37%
  2. На карту с точками44%
  3. По ситуации / не замечал(а), куда именно20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Dressen Viktor

1 Apr 2026, 07:35 UTC405 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день друзья😍 Мои клиенты знают одну из моих любимых фраз: вся наша жизнь - это психология. И продажи - это тоже психология. Так вот, на днях клиент задал мне вопрос, который застал меня в тупик (а такое бывает редко)🤔 Но для меня, как для человека, который любит цифры и привык подкреплять свои выводы статистикой, этот вопрос оказался действительно интересным. Вопрос был такой: Где вы в первую очередь ищете

❤‍🔥4🤝2

Signed Dressen Viktor

7 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,070 views171 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья😍 Пост будет направлен, как я их люблю называть, к старообрядцам ❤️ Все мы помним, что с 1 сентября 2025 года заработала часть 10.7 статьи 5 закона «О рекламе». Она категорически запрещает размещать рекламу на сайтах нежелательных, экстремистских и террористических организаций, а также на любых ресурсах, заблокированных Роскомнадзором. Я уже писал, что пора уходить нам в МАХ и вот уже началось

👍165custom 54564247947045830263❤‍🔥2🔥1

Signed Dressen Viktor

6 Mar 2026, 08:10 UTC850 views78 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья😍 Сегодня у меня пост из серии: «я в шоке, дорогая редакция» .. это мягко сказать Если вам кажется, что вы честно работаете, зарабатываете деньги и потом можете спокойно распоряжаться ими по своему усмотрению - у меня для вас плохие новости. Это не совсем так🤷‍♂️ Рассказываю на своем примере. У меня расчетный счет в Точка Банке. Банк к слову очень хороший. И, как мне объяснили, такая система де

👍67custom 545642479470458302611

Signed Dressen Viktor

4 Mar 2026, 08:40 UTC772 views241 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, друзья😍 Перед 8 Марта в салонах красоты всегда больше оплат: сертификаты, абонементы, подарочные процедуры. И в этот же период активизируются мошенники - чаще всего через «срочные возвраты»💰 Сценарий, который выглядит правдоподобно Мужчина покупает абонемент/сертификат «в подарок», а через 1–3 часа пишет и просит вернуть деньги, потому что: «Мы расстались, подарок уже не актуален», «Попал в аварию /

🔥158👍83

Signed Dressen Viktor

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dvprobiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Apr 2026, 07:35 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

Когда вы ищете компанию на Яндекс Картах, куда в первую очередь смотрите?

  1. На список слева (название, рейтинг, отзывы)37%
  2. На карту с точками44%
  3. По ситуации / не замечал(а), куда именно20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jan 2026, 12:14 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

Вы уже создали бизнес-канал в MAX?

  1. Думаю, нужен аккаунт 10 000+ подписчиков11%
  2. Не вижу смысла20%
  3. Нет, но интересно52%
  4. Уже сделал(а)7%
  5. А, я не голосую :)12%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🟡 Business | Виктор” (@dvprobiz), 935 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dvprobiz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.