Channel
@dve_rats
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002171929480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dve_rats |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dve_rats |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 91 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 91 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
116 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 54 | 46.6% | |
| custom 5318946190094523516 | 35 | 30.2% | |
| custom 5319047723121400158 | 18 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5318963077905931417 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| custom 5319304016704853130 | 3 | 2.59% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Есть еще такие фото, у Вани нет своего канала, поэтому я нагло выложу сюда💪 🤩Дориан Павус - Ufo (отметить его тоже нельзя👹) 🤩Ph :@katrinumka
🔥18custom 531894619009452351612custom 53189630779059314176
Signed Марина
Пришли просто ШЕДЕВРАЛЬНЫЕ фотокарточки по Драгон эйдж! Начнем спам😩😩 Hawke @firir_art Ph: @katrinumka
🔥16custom 531894619009452351614custom 53190477231214001587
Signed Марина
С днём рождения!
Signed Space idiot
Ah shit, here we go again... 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Праздник детства и никуда от него не деться... Много что в этот год успелось, много чего ещё не успелось. Планов пока хватает и это... бодрит, что-ли. Главное чтобы хватило ещё и времени на всё. 🤪 Если есть желание поздравить - кидайте сюда мемных котов, люблю котов💃
custom 53189461900945235164
Signed Space idiot
Сегодня кайфово выбрать на фотосет с Дорианом и Хоук Поморозились возле Камня и побывали в Пестчере😂 Теперь ждем красоту от @katrinumka
custom 531904772312140015811🔥5
Signed Марина
Проявлю признаки жизни и скину единственную фотку крафта ног Дарт Мола, которые были сделаны на этот АИ Больше красивых фоток можно посмотреть у @moonysnox
🔥15custom 53189461900945235165custom 53193040167048531303
Signed Марина
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @dve_rats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,067,831 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐀Две половинки крысы 🐀” (@dve_rats), 91 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dve_rats.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.