Channel
@dushevnie_vstrechi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+67 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003665791292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dushevnie_vstrechi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dushevnie_vstrechi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 131 | +6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 125 | +7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 118 | +8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 110 | +24 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 86 | +21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 65 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 65 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 64 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
83 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 38.6% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 26.5% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 20.5% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 8.43% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 6.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀 «А вдруг мне там будет некомфортно?» Наверное, хотя бы раз такая мысль приходила многим перед встречей, где никого не знаешь. Что если разговор не сложится? Что если я буду чувствовать себя не в своей тарелке? Что если мне просто нечего будет рассказать? Но за время наших встреч мы всё чаще замечаем одну вещь. Самые теплые разговоры начинаются не тогда, когда люди стараются произвести впечатление. А тогда, когд…
👍2
🤔 Как проходят встречи Клуба? Многие перед первой встречей представляют примерно так: «Наверное, сейчас посадят в круг и скажут: "Ну что ж, расскажите о себе..."» 😅 Спойлер: нет. Когда вы приходите, мы встречаем каждого лично. Пока собираются остальные участники, можно спокойно заказать чай, кофе или что-нибудь поесть, немного осмотреться и привыкнуть к атмосфере. Потом мы коротко рассказываем про Клуб, знакоми…
👍5🔥5❤4🥰3
👋 Соскучились, друзья? 13 августа в 19:00 встречаемся в Клубе Душевных Разговоров. Тема вечера: ✨ «Самая неожиданная находка» Есть одна любопытная особенность. Мы часто очень долго ищем что-то одно. Любовь всей своей жизни. Любимое дело. Новых друзей. Ответы и подсказки. Себя.🙃 А потом оказывается, что самое ценное приходит к нам откуда совсем не ждали. Случайный разговор меняет профессию. Обычная поездка станов…
❤5
Какие форматы встреч вам были бы интересны помимо душевных разговоров❓🙂 (проголосовать можно за несколько вариантов)
The shares total 245%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥3
Самое ценное в нашем Клубе — это не только разговоры, а то, как незнакомые люди постепенно становятся ближе. 🤍 И мы подумали: а что если создавать такие моменты не только через разговоры, но и через совместные впечатления? Не только сидеть за столом и общаться, а вместе пробовать что-то новое, активничать, удивляться и узнавать друг друга в других ситуациях и форматах. Поэтому хотим спросить вас. Какие форматы вс…
👍2
В прошедшую среду в нашем Клубе состоялась очередная встреча, на которую пришло рекордное количество участников. Некоторых желающих присоединиться пришлось даже перенести на следующий раз, чтобы сохранить камерность общения. Это значит, что наш Клуб развивается бодрыми темпами, скоро будем собирать душевные стадионы. 😁 А пока ловите видео встречи из уютного грузинского ресторанчика в центре Москвы. Благодарим всех…
❤6🔥5🤗2
Ребят, кто забыл рюкзак и зонт?
Photo, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
👍1🥰1
*только не в 15:00, а 15-го 😁 Всех ждём вечером, в 19:00 👋
👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰3🔥2🤗1
😯 Секрет хорошего собеседника — не в умении говорить Иногда нам кажется, что интересный человек — это тот, кто много рассказывает. У него всегда есть наготове какая-то история из жизни. Он легко шутит. Умеет поддержать любой разговор. Но на самом деле самые приятные разговоры часто получаются не с теми, кто говорит больше всех. А с теми, кто умеет слушать. Кто действительно вовлечен в беседу. Кто задаёт вопросы н…
❤4👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dushevnie_vstrechi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие форматы встреч вам были бы интересны помимо душевных разговоров❓🙂 (проголосовать можно за несколько вариантов)
The shares total 245%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клуб Душевных Разговоров | Канал” (@dushevnie_vstrechi), 131 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dushevnie_vstrechi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.