正如预料的那样,伊朗与美国之间从未实现真正的和平。美国恢复了对伊朗领土的轰炸。德黑兰则打击了美国驻巴林军事基地,并再次关闭了霍尔木兹海峡。然而,这一切并没有奏效,而且从一开始就不可能奏效。你不能与达贾勒(Dajjal)做交易。① 这是什叶派形而上学的一项基本原则。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 绝不要与达贾勒谈判

Channel
第四政治/多極世界理論學會
@dugincn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
690subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001758547951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dugincn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dugincn |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 690 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 692 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 693 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 698 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 702 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 702 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 50m
- Average length
- 36m 53s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
亚历山大·杜金警告说,如果俄罗斯想要赢得这场文明战争,就必须超越已经耗尽自身潜力的现状。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 这场战争要求一个新的俄罗斯
彼岸世界并非某个完全独立的存在,不是另一颗星球,也不是另一个宇宙,而是我们这个世界的另一重维度。更准确地说:我们的尘世世界不过是完整的、三维存在的一个截面,一个地平线。一切都取决于我们的价值取向。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 死亡即觉醒
亚历山大·杜金谴责任何与后现代西方的妥协,并坚持认为俄罗斯的文明论路径是唯一可能的范式。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 文明还是彻底的黑暗
亚历山大·杜金认为,圣彼得堡国际经济论坛体现了俄罗斯对多极世界秩序的持久承诺,并以此对抗西方的全球霸权。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 圣彼得堡国际经济论坛、主权与多极世界
委内瑞拉正在一点一点地放弃自己的主权——石油许可证、黄金储备、铀资源,如今连亚历克斯·萨阿布也被交给了美国人。当华盛顿操控一切时,玻利瓦尔式的独立还剩下什么? ✍️ 列昂尼德·萨文 🗣 委内瑞拉的去主权化:亚历克斯·萨阿布已被移交给美国人
在这篇哲学文本中,Alexander Dugin 将技术描绘的并非一种中立工具,而是一种具有毁灭性的形而上学力量,它与控制体系、暴力以及精神堕落密不可分。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 《技术共和国与西方的自杀》
亚历山大·杜金认为,图尔西·加巴德的离职标志着原初 MAGA 项目的终结,也标志着对美国在俄罗斯和多极化方向上开启新路线的希望彻底破灭。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 图尔西·加巴德与 MAGA 的终结
海德格尔以更加审慎的态度看待取代前苏格拉底哲学家的东西,即苏格拉底、柏拉图和亚里士多德。他把希腊哲学的这一第二时期称为“第一个开端¹框架之内的终结之开始”。开端仍在持续,晚霞仍在泛红,传统的希腊仍然活着,但终结已经弥漫在空气中。终结已经临近。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 柏拉图主义的灾难(理念与表象)
我祝贺所有人胜利日快乐!他们赢得了胜利。随后,在相当长的一段时间里,我们都依靠那场胜利而生活。后来,那场胜利的果实被人从我们手中夺走。他们甚至还试图夺走这个伟大的节日本身。但他们失败了。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 在两场胜利之间
我们确信这个世界是存在的——也就是我们以身体和感觉生活于其中的这个世界。有时,我们也承认上帝存在,但我们总是把祂同我们的世界联系起来:我们与祂。我们请求祂在这个属于我们的世界中帮助我们,或以某种方式介入其中。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 死者醒着的地方
英国国王查理三世在国会发表讲话,呼吁维护北约、支持乌克兰政权,并共同发动一场针对俄罗斯的战争。国会为之鼓掌。尤其是民主党人,尽管也有相当数量的共和党人同样鼓掌。 ✍️ 亚历山大·杜金 🗣 两王交战
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dugincn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JShangrong · 24,860
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@twtiran · 48,679
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“第四政治/多極世界理論學會” (@dugincn), 690 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dugincn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.