Хто шарить де в Дніпрі купити літні маскувальні сітки?
❤4

Channel
@duelist_fables
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
733subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001813072512 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @duelist_fables |
| Description | Цей канал створено для публікації текстових матеріалів в доповнення до нашого Ютуб-проєкту. Дякуємо, що підтримуєте нас. Підтримати фінансово: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/5iQTWDFsHG |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/duelist_fables |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 733 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 733 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
700 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 179 | 25.6% | |
| 👍 | 168 | 24.0% | |
| 🔥 | 152 | 21.7% | |
| ❤ | 125 | 17.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 59 | 8.43% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 1.57% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.429% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.286% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.143% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 700reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хто шарить де в Дніпрі купити літні маскувальні сітки?
❤4
Нове відео вже на каналі. Запрошую до перегляду. https://youtu.be/BhUdX4faXHk
❤🔥17👍8🔥5❤2👀1
Настав час полювання на відьом!)) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxpSqksTaZA
🔥20
Німецький меч і 17 століття. Як бачите, не все, що виглядає як шпага, має витончений клинок. Іноді це солідний такий меч, з повнорозмірним масивним клинком. Подібна зброя була більш характерною саме для військових. Тонкі рапірні клинки смертоносніші, але широкі рублячі мають кращу зупиняючу дію. Тому тонкі клинки носили дуелянти і авантюристи, а широкі - офіцери. Звісно, насправді носили те, що подобалось і могли со…
👍41🔥19❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤9
Шановний Назар Драган, якщо ви читаєте мій канал, а донатили на збір Антона Козерацького, ви виграли приз. Зверніться до мене чи Антона в лс. Дякую.
❤2
Так, це оффтоп, зовсім не по темі каналу. Але бути свідками справді історичних подій не менш цікаво, ніж вивчати їх з далини років. Прямо зараз, вперше за понад 50 років, людство знову відправило своїх паредставників до Місяця. Грандіозна епопея, яку почала програма "Аполлон" отримала продовження. Екіпаж "Артеміди ІІ" вже ближче до Місяця, ніж до Землі. Якщо ви, як і я, любите такі історії і хочете спостерігати їх …
👍20❤11
Якщо я раптом колись впаду в кому, ви знаєте, що робити))
😁38❤28💯3
Симпатяжки))
❤58🔥27❤🔥2
Отже, ми створюємо Орден, що має боротися з драконами. Він має ресурси спорядити військо, а також вогнепальну зброю. Як може виглядати така організація у фентезі? Щоб перемагати великих драконів, вам потрібно швидко завдати багато демеджу. В технологічних реаліях 16-17 століть це означає масу стрільців. Але, щоб не бути розчавленими одним ударом, загін має бути мобільним. Тому як прообраз я запропонував рейтарів час…
🔥28🤔3
В минулому Драконоборці використовували дуже довгі списи (піки), що досягали 4–6 метрів у довжину. Шикувалися в каре. Перші ряди тримали списи горизонтально, створюючи непрохідну стіну з вістрям. Такою тактикою заганяли та вбивали повзаючих драконів. Та це призводило до жахливих втрат. Тому, коли драконів було багато, Орден набирав у свої ряди «одноразову» піхоту, часто вдаючись до примусових мобілізацій у регіонах, …
🔥32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUbUKWji630
👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @duelist_fables. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 831,848 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@duelist_fables named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Байки Дуелянта” (@duelist_fables), 733 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duelist_fables.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.