Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Блондинка в Загоне

@duchessofsuccess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,726subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002826364923
TypeChannel
Username@duchessofsuccess
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/duchessofsuccess

Growth

2,7262,7402,7336 August 2026 — 2,740 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,740 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,738 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,734 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,726 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,724–2,742 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:152,726-8
10 Aug 2026, 13:352,734-4
7 Aug 2026, 06:322,738-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:062,740no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:062,740first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.0%
avg views ÷ 2,726 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total18,800
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 7 August 2026

Как видим из нового сезона ПКБ, Хун Фу заполнила эту пустоту от потери дочери другой ученицей, которая стала ей не только дочерью, но и союзником на пути и правой рукой в управлении поселением потерянных. Девица эта тоже потеряла свою опору в виде любимого, (глупым образом) погибшего на задании, поэтому прибилась к учителю (Хун Фу) и обрела в её лице опору на пути и смысл жизни. В целом, они друг друга нашли, но вс

21 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 7 August 2026

Remember: if someone else opens the door, it is not your door. Помни: если кто-то другой открывает дверь, это не твоя дверь. Ошо. Хорошо.

20 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 7 August 2026

Так вот, при просмотре нового сезона поразила ещё более заметная пропасть между ХЛ и остальными персонажами в том смысле, что из всех культиваторов лишь он занимается непосредственно культивацией бессмертия. Теперь к нему присоединилась Наньгун, поэтому можно говорить, что лишь они двое мотивированы именно совершенством и живут исходя из этой цели - достичь бессмертия, выйти из колеса сансары, выйти из цикла воплоще

20 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ну что ж, посмотрела разом все новые, вышедшие к этому моменту серии ПКБ. Впечатления: 1. Активирован новый персонаж. Наньгун Ван изменили не только внешность, но и личность. Видимо, решили привести её в большее соответствие этому персонажу в книге. Но из-за столь значительных перемен, теперь она воспринимается как совершенно новая (и юная) воздыхательница по ХЛ. 2. Не хватает красивых природных локаций Школы Падши

19 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 7 August 2026

My time as a human was over. But I never felt more alive. I was born to be a vampire. Что мне ещё нравится в "Сумерках", так это ирония с поверхностным смыслом и тайным смыслом. (Хотя не такой уж он и тайный, но большинством всё равно не видим). Это про то, что на поверхности фильм считывается как история про романтическую любовь. Нужно найти своего "того самого", не пропустить, и тогда тебя ждёт хеппи энд: дом пол

16 Jul 2026, 21:03 UTC≈2,000 viewsread 7 August 2026

Альтернативный финал Саги "Сумерки". Дисклеймер: 1. Действие начинается с момента развилки, в которую Белла попадает в начале 2-ой части, когда Эдвард покидает её, думая, что так он охраняет её от себя и даёт ей шанс на "счастливую человеческую жизнь". 2. В этой альтернативной реальности отсутствует Джейк и линия с волками-оборотнями. Сразу 2 парня с суперспособностями - всё-таки чересчур даже для Беллы. Существую

16 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 7 August 2026

Досматриваю 5 часть Сумерек. Кажется, я сейчас напишу альтернативный финал саги.

16 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пелевин, Возвращение Синей Бороды #книги

15 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 7 August 2026

На тему рабов подсказали великолепную притчу: Смотрите, – сказал фараон жрецам, – Внизу длинные шеренги закованных в цепи рабов несут по одному камню. Их охраняет множество солдат. Чем больше рабов, тем лучше для государства – так мы всегда считали. Но, чем больше рабов, тем более приходится опасаться их бунта. Мы усиливаем охрану. Мы вынуждены хорошо кормить своих рабов, иначе они не смогут выполнять тяжёлую физиче

15 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 7 August 2026

Итого, что было сказано: 1. Идеальный раб - это тот, кто доказывает, что он не раб. 2. Идеальный раб - это тот, кто считает себя свободным. Второе утверждение лишено смысла. Первое - верно. А ведь человек думал, что в точности повторил сказанное.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @duchessofsuccess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 180,021 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блондинка в Загоне” (@duchessofsuccess), 2,726 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duchessofsuccess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.