Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Der tägliche Wahnsinn ✅

@dtwahnsinn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

732subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001202716014
TypeChannel
Username@dtwahnsinn
Created9 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dtwahnsinn

Growth

7327347336 August 2026 — 734 subscribers6 August 2026 — 734 subscribers14 August 2026 — 732 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 732–734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:55732-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:12734no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:49734first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.1%
avg views ÷ 732 subscribers
Avg views / post
235
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (21 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,116
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC35 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Das Jahr ist zwar nicht rum, aber laut KI hatte 2025 war die Waldbrandfläche 7.1x so groß wie letztes Jahr, eigentlich müsste man ja davon ausgehen, dass es bei dieser Hitze genau andersrum ist 😅

26 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC430 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Habt ihr den Eindruck, dass die Tage wieder länger sind, seit CERN abgeschaltet wurde?

  1. Ja41%
  2. Nein59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC389 viewsread 6 August 2026

Im Alter von 71 Jahren (gibt herumgedreht 17 😁) sagt Milliarden-Mike, dass die Deutschland GmbH Insolvenzverschleppung betreibt und er sie verklagen wird. So gegen Ende der Sendung ist das ein Thema: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUouwkNKymI

22 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC185 viewsread 6 August 2026

Beim Kai tönen im Hintergrund die Sirenen, die glaube die Russen kommen. Habe sowas noch nie gesehen/gehört 🤣 https://youtu.be/ZxfRRAwIsTE?t=108

20 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC430 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Aktuelles Preisentwicklungs-Chart von E10. Selbst generiert über zugreifbare Daten.

19 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC151 viewsread 6 August 2026

Ah Moment, später wird gesagt, das Bild würde Peters Großvater im Dienst porträtieren.

19 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC158 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Peter Lustig macht's richtig und hat sich in seinen Wohnwagen den Kaiser hingehängt 😁

19 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC165 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Mandela-Effekt: Wer kann sich noch dran erinnern, dass Peter Lustig schwul war?

  1. Ja23%
  2. Nein77%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC256 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Interessant, das kann kein Zufall sein, dass diese Dinger genau zum perfekten Zeitpunkt eingeführt wurden!

9 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC218 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @TiQToQBQQmsVideo

💊Schon 2x wurde die 📲CHATKONTROLLE auf 🇪🇺EU-Ebene ABGELEHNT! Nun möchte man sie doch noch unbedingt & kurz vor der SOMMERPAUSE durchdrücken💊 Martin SONNEBORN kritisiert dies scharf und bekommt dafür das 🎙️Mikro 🔇abgestellt!! 💣BQQMS💣 https://t.me/TiQToQBQQms

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dtwahnsinn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

Habt ihr den Eindruck, dass die Tage wieder länger sind, seit CERN abgeschaltet wurde?

  1. Ja41%
  2. Nein59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Mandela-Effekt: Wer kann sich noch dran erinnern, dass Peter Lustig schwul war?

  1. Ja23%
  2. Nein77%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,347,829 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Der tägliche Wahnsinn ✅” (@dtwahnsinn), 732 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dtwahnsinn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.