Channel
@dtjournal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
234subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003566613322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dtjournal |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 9 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dtjournal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 234 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 230 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 230 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 54.1% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 45.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey everyone, will be consolidating all activity to the community groupchat. Annoucements, feature releases, giveaways and discounts will all be done in the group chat from now on so if you guys have not joined yet do do so soon! @dtjournalcommunity
🔥6
Hey guys! As promised, light mode is now mostly complete and in production. Do let me know how it is for you guys and whether there are weird colours popping up in places they shouldn't be! You can switch light mode on directly from settings > preferences
DT Journal v2.0 is here 🚀 v1 gave you everything a solid trading journal needs. v2 turns that foundation into a complete AI-powered improvement system — with AI analysis, historical backtesting, forward testing, and deeper integrations, all designed to build the discipline that separates consistent traders from the rest. Here's what's new: ✨ Edge AI — A fully integrated AI system that reads across all your trades, jo…
❤1
Hi everyone, DT Journal v2 will finally be releasing tomorrow. The planned maintainance will be from 430-630pm UTC+8 where the website may face some issues due to the updating. Thank you all for your continued support and looking forward to hear your feedback on the new update
🔥3
Guys the update will be out this Sun, I actually can't wait to show you guys the work. It's like it's a completely new website. I'll drop the official announcement soon but here's a preview
❤5
Alright thanks everyone, we've hit the maximum number of testers, appreciate all of y'all
Also update that DT Journal finally has a developer so it's no longer just a solo project anymore! Hope to push out even better and comprehensive features soon!
❤3
Hey everyone 👋 We're rolling out some big new features to DT Journal (including the Backtester and new AI features) and I'm looking for 5 people to test them out before they go live. What you'll get: • Early access to features before anyone else • Pro access and unlimited AI tokens during the testing period • Direct line to shape how the product develops What I need from you: • Actually use it and log your feedbac…
❤2
Hey everyone, for those of you in the EU that were previously unable to find the app on the app store, I have just got my information verified by Apple and you should be able to see the app now. Thank you for your patience
🔥1
Haven't posted about DT Journal in a while but here's where things are at. Been building two features that I think genuinely change how the website feels to use: a smarter AI layer for Edge, and a backtester that lives inside your journal. No more switching tools. Oh and the economic calendar too that will warn you of news events The screenshot above is where the backtester UI is at right now. Still a lot to polish…
❤4
Hey guys, just wanted to get a quick sense how many of you guys would use a backtesting feature in DT Journal. Because I don't to build one for nothing if I do
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3❤2
🚀 Big update to DT Journal over the past couple of days. We’ve rolled out a major upgrade to Structured Analysis, which is now fully unified into a single system with a cleaner workflow that mirrors how traders actually operate: 📋 Plan → 📈 Execute → 🔍 Review → 📊 Improve One powerful use case is forward testing. You can now create an analysis for a specific period, document your plan and expectations, and then revi…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dtjournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hey guys, just wanted to get a quick sense how many of you guys would use a backtesting feature in DT Journal. Because I don't to build one for nothing if I do
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 5 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 464,192 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DT Journal” (@dtjournal), 234 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dtjournal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.