Channel
@dstnyri
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003537736284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dstnyri |
| Created | 6 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dstnyri |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 93 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 92 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 92 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (6 March 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,117 |
| Reactions total | 144 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
164 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5263002974048777823 | 53 | 32.3% | |
| custom 5258258830483026747 | 45 | 27.4% | |
| custom 5424904850058015848 | 31 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5262897008615653915 | 18 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5283272359237672309 | 17 | 10.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dstnyri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
I chose the right person 🤩 pls never let other people convince u to walk away from someone u love in the end you’ll thank yourself 🐈
custom 52630029740487778233custom 52832723592376723093custom 54249048500580158482custom 52582588304830267471
but honestly it’s hard to feel different
custom 52582588304830267474custom 52630029740487778233custom 54249048500580158483custom 52832723592376723091
started writing in a diary in english a few days ago and honestly i’d really recommend trying it 🌫️ you not only pick up new words and find new ways to say things, but your thoughts also feel way less messy. it’s kinda crazy how just writing things down can make everything feel a little easier ): and if you love romanticizing life as much as i do, it can easily become a little ritual 🤩
custom 52832723592376723095custom 52582588304830267474custom 52630029740487778234custom 52628970086156539151
people don’t always see themselves the way i see them — beautiful, precious, and full of warmth sometimes, in their eyes, i find a whole universe. a quiet little corner where i feel safe maybe eyes really do say more than words ever could..
custom 52630029740487778234custom 54249048500580158483custom 52582588304830267472custom 52628970086156539151custom 52832723592376723091
Sticker, posted without a caption
⬜ 🤩 little piece of a feeling i never want to lose 🥯
Sticker, posted without a caption
⬜⬜🤩 have two sides of me🤩🤩 🤩🤍 8:00am: feeling like i can do anything, romanticizing my life, believing in my future, wanting to connect with everyone but still keeping a little distance, smiling at small things and having endless energy 🌟🤩 03:17am: headphones on, lost in my thoughts, analyzing every little detail from the day, even a random sentence someone said, craving quietness and comfort, suddenly feeling …
custom 52582588304830267478custom 52832723592376723096custom 52630029740487778235custom 52628970086156539152
212
🌟🩹huening green flag 🩹he makes you feel chosen . он дает ощущение, что тебя замечают и выбирают. он заставит тебя думать: «мне не нужно меняться, чтобы меня любили» as. мягкая игрушка из детства, объятия после тяжелого дня, смех на кухне
custom 52630029740487778235custom 52582588304830267474custom 52628970086156539154custom 54249048500580158481
🌟🩹taehyun green flag 🩹honest communication . с ним не нужно угадывать - он скажет все прямо и честно. он умеет слушать, говорить честно и уважать чужие мысли as. «я понимаю, почему ты это чувствуешь», заметки в телефоне, открытое окно утром
custom 54249048500580158486custom 52582588304830267475custom 52630029740487778235
🤩 🩹beomgyu green flag 🩹remembers the little things . замечает мелочи: настроение, любимые вещи, маленькие детали. он бережет это и делает простые моменты особенными as. холодный кофе, сообщения в три часа ночи, фотографии на старую камеру
custom 52582588304830267476custom 52630029740487778235custom 54249048500580158485
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dstnyri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 904,058 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“couldn’t sleep” (@dstnyri), 93 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dstnyri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.