每天都在线收单,当日订单请在18:00前报单完成 DS数据 @dsj123a
❤1

Channel
@dsj123aa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002799460430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsj123aa |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsj123aa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 191 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 182 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 183 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 183 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (30 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 736 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
每天都在线收单,当日订单请在18:00前报单完成 DS数据 @dsj123a
❤1
股票类全库: 高能,天相,约牛,弘历,智牛,亚商,顶点,格隆汇,五星,众赢,点睛,中广云,和讯,汇阳 资金盘类全库: 两重宏利,银发蓝海,扩大内需,数字钱包,人民至上,共富活动,丝路计划,一带一路,民生福祉,中伊友谊,两重建设,政信,十五五规划,上合共济,国家数据局,民政通讯,云闪付家人,狮家人,圆梦签到,圆梦征程,圆梦行动,数农通信,提振消费,爱聚诺联,交联圆梦,强国梦,红旗河,民生保障,三北,中央普惠工程,绸固发展,云泊控股,高质量发展,大国工匠,大国崛起,民生普惠,十五五大业,中国基建,上合慈协,人民资产,西部征程,圆梦改革,民生大事 教育类全库: 高顿教育,光环 @dsj123a
❤1
三网短信拦截全格式强势来袭 可挑平台(度小满,洋钱罐借款,美团,唯品金融,美团月付,滴滴数科,哈罗臻有钱,上海嘉海通,美团借钱,宜享花,美团金融服务,青岛海之欧,构想生活,美团支付)目前只能出这些平台 规则:平台名称,关键词,当天提交当天出数,保百分百精准,地区不挑平台,全国可挑 出数时间t0 起提数量:3000起 注:由于时间问题,不会当时下单秒出当天的单子,当天晚上都交付 @dsj123a
不同地区需要不同的平台数据,不同的项目需要客户不同的资质,实测自己地区的产品,选好产品并长期续费 @dsj123a
真正的需求客户,奔着成交来的,会明确表达自己的需求,几乎几句话就开始成交了 而那些今天问问免测吗,明天问问免测吗,基本要么没实力 要么刚入行,连简单的分辨商家都不会,简单的几个方式验证下 1.查看频道更新时间(最早无编辑的发布时间)当然现在很多 频道被封,只能作为参考 2.如果你不了解商家,且成交金额较大,建议观察几天, 真正的商家每天都要在线处理业务,观察是否每天在线 3.对您的问题是否能够提供专业的技术解答 对于合理要求是会满足的,会根据您的实测反馈,不断的调整优化模型 只有片子什么都能答应你(不要想着花几百几千就能渗透某个站的数据) 4.真正的商家地址每天都会有进账,每天都要做业务,每天都会有收入 (骗子不可能每天都开张的,那种十天半个月入账一次的,你认为 他的数据能达到每天复购吗?) 5.能快速提供客户的购买记录,复购记录,以及成交时间,下发截图,地址流水的 满足以上五个条件,还能被骗的,建议卸载飞机 …
👍4
产品: 新网银行-好人贷,(混合你好E贷与长沙快乐秒贷) 来源:技术大模型 精准度:70% 适合公司:地区助贷, AB贷 可出区域: 所有地级市 起定量及出数时间 :500起. 当晚出数. @dsj123a
你在考虑的时候,同行已经出发了 DS数据:@dsj123a
❤1
选一些小众的直播间,反而效果会更高,指定直播间停留,支持到市 @dsj123a
这就是不同提取系统精准度,质量不同,价格当然不同咯 数据不分好坏,只有合适你的数据。才是好数据 无免测,支持盘口免费提取对库,新客户支持2000条起提。 DS数据 @dsj123a
生意都是从小做到大的,持续稳定赚钱就是好数据。发要求,付款,下发,结算,就是这么简单 @dsj123a
❤2
租机,申请 下机 @dsj123a
❤1
收货地址,全国可筛选,年龄,男女 可到县级 @dsj123a
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dsj123aa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 346,665 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“运营商大数据-棋牌数据-菠菜数据-股票数据-六合数据-体育数据-彩票数据-网贷数据” (@dsj123aa), 191 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsj123aa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.