Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for дизайн — это работа

Channel

дизайн — это работа

@dsgnsavinova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

798subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001887741948
TypeChannel
Username@dsgnsavinova
DescriptionКанал Савиновой Виктории (@saviini) Дизайн, работа, жизнь и мемы
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dsgnsavinova

Growth

7986 Aug 2026, 22:03 — 798 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:15 — 798 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:036 Aug 2026, 22:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 797–799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:15798no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03798first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
270
Videos
22
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53122232434263526035447.0%
💅3732.2%
custom 54741945690567622471916.5%
💔54.35%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dsgnsavinova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 April 2026 to 7 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 May 2026, 16:18 UTC624 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

давно не было музыки для работы сегодня двигаем пиксели под вот этот сетик первые полторы минуты были сомнительными и захотелось выключить, но потом полился мёд на уши

custom 54741945690567622472

6 May 2026, 18:21 UTC611 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

ворклог середина полугодия прошла, а значит самое время актуализировать свои цели и понять, как бодро мы к ним бежим и добегаем ли вообще. а ещё это хороший момент, чтобы заранее подумать про отчёт к ревью: какие кейсы туда пойдут, какие материалы под них нужны, что надо собирать уже сейчас, пока процессы ещё горячие потому что классика IT-мира такова: один проект заканчивается, сразу начинается другой, паузы на «с

custom 53122232434263526039

29 Apr 2026, 19:15 UTC562 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

пожалуй, пойду без записи в старые добрые Воронцовские, закажу скумбрию горячего копчения с пивом и буду счастлива

custom 531222324342635260315custom 54741945690567622472

29 Apr 2026, 19:14 UTC446 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

давно не была в бане, зашла к Владе на канал почитать новости банного мира, увидела новое пространство по картинкам всё очень красиво, свежо, выглядит как тот самый аккуратный московский велнес, куда можно просто прийти и ни о чём не думать заранее. в общем, сразу захотелось воодушевлённая этим порывом я ещё не знала, что до возгорания жопы остаётся пара минут....

💅2custom 54741945690567622472

29 Apr 2026, 19:14 UTC549 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

они, конечно, фэнси красотули, но их запись — это какой-то пиздец отстутствие базового календаря? чтобы выбрать 8 мая мне надо 9 раз кликнуть и подождать прогрузку слотов? are you fucking kidding me? дальше список часов, причём сеансы разбиты по одному часу, и тебе нужно натыкать, сколько часов ты хочешь провести в бане потом появляется мастерпис этого флоу — попап, который выглядит как системная ошибка: «укажите к

💅9

28 Apr 2026, 20:47 UTC481 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я могла бы быть сейчас на свидании (хотя какие свидания, вы погоду в Москве видели?), но вместо этого размечаю медицинские запросы про чью-то мошонку... работа в Поиске имеет много специфичных аспектов, один из них — качество ответов. можно надизайнить красивые тематические блоки, но какой от них будет толк, если вместо внятного ответа поиск выдаст что-то левое. к Поиску обращаются с бескрайним морем запросов: от с

custom 531222324342635260310💅7💔4custom 54741945690567622474

10 Apr 2026, 08:02 UTC559 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

возвращаясь к теме кофе ваша жертва маркетинга повелась на дизайн упаковки, приправленный фразой лимитед эдишн. конечно не дрипы с авторскими иллюстрациями, но тоже красиво теперь пьём психоделические высокоранговые воронки

custom 531222324342635260310

8 Apr 2026, 20:02 UTC563 views10 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

вчера был День Поиска — ежегодное событие, на котором Яндекс рассказывает, что нового произошло в Поиске и куда мы движемся. в том числе и Медицина, которую я делаю. я впервые попала на День Поиска оффлайн, живое присутствие дало х10 к впечатлениям и вдохновению. ты вроде знаешь, что твоя работа — часть чего-то большого, но одно дело знать, и совсем другое — быть на презентации и видеть, как это «большее» разворачив

custom 53122232434263526036💅2💔1custom 54741945690567622471

4 Apr 2026, 19:30 UTC563 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня состоялось открытие выставки серии «100 обложек» от «Яндекс Книг» 🧡 Дизайнеры Яндекса смотрят на современные бестселлеры как на будущую классику и создают для них новые обложки: 100 дизайнеров, 100 взглядов на книги, 100 историй. Выставка покажет особый жанр «книги художника» — livre d’artiste, который представляет собой отдельное произведение искусства, полностью оформленное автором. Приходите в Бродильный

💅17custom 53122232434263526034

3 Apr 2026, 06:48 UTC472 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

> пытаешься найти старый концепт > видишь страницу с ключевыми словами future 2026, думаешь о наверное оно, заходишь >>> спасибо, дура

custom 54741945690567622478

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dsgnsavinova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,250,341 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дизайн — это работа” (@dsgnsavinova), 798 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsgnsavinova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.