之前的被封了 阿貍新帳號 https://t.me/knnh84

Channel
北部秘密花園
@dsf74d
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002146888781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsf74d |
| Created | Between 1 January 2024 and 30 June 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsf74d |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 36 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 37 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 11 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2024 to 30 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
你的小女僕來咯 #雙北推薦 【小琪 157.C.44kg 20歲】 可愛乖巧的小女僕 等待哥哥來解鎖 很喜歡玩cosplay的妹妹 可以配合變裝秀 身材嬌小 腿卻很長 皮膚很白 穴穴很緊 喜歡玩sm 喜歡被強姦的感覺~
🎀甜酷少女 #雙北推薦 【凌凌 164.C.47kg 21歲】 學服裝設計的妹妹 身材超級好 穿衣很有品味 打扮很好看 氣質完全不像茶妹 性格很有趣 很有內涵 跟她來一場約會一定很難忘
18歲失學少女 #雙北推薦 #特價7000 妹妹很愛穿過膝長襪 超級性感 聲音很好聽 叫床超級厲害 放得開 玩的開 很主動 適合新手又想嘗試學生妹的哥哥~
#雙北推薦 #第一天下海 #找試車客人 #試車價超優惠 暫定7000 【雪琪 165.C.46kg.24歲】 身材一絕 比例很好 很修長的美腿 穿搭很清爽 長髮及腰 女友感拉滿 妹妹說體力很好 可以全自動 希望找一個不那麼暴力的哥哥 比較喜歡慢慢來循序漸進的做愛過程 注重更女友感的哥哥一定要約這個妹妹喔 體驗感一定很棒
#雙北推薦 #特價8000 【小純 166.C.47kg 24歲】 純慾幼稚園老師 膚白顏值高耐看 溫柔貼心的服務讓你一次又一次心動啦 穿著打扮都很時尚性感 服務尺度大開 滿足哥哥的所有慾望
新妹報班 #雙北推薦 【蘇蘇 158.C.42kg.18歲】 高中生 嬌小型的美人魚 大眼睛顏值爆表的臉蛋皮膚嫩 小隻好超控適合抱著幹 ~ 配合度很高叫床身超好聽
新妹報到 #雙北推薦 【小櫻 158.D+.44kg.18歲】 性感可愛迷人的大奶學生妹 臉蛋看起來可愛清純 在床上確實一直性感小野貓 性慾超大 反差萌妹子 需要哥哥精液投餵 哥哥越猛 妹妹越愛 尺度很大喔
🥰言言 160/C/22歲 #雙北 口技精湛 擅長後背式和女上位 大膽熱辣 小隻但是很有料的哦~ 還會根據你的喜好扮演不同的角色 無論是誘惑的女教師還是調皮的女僕... 🥰重要看點:@sqc6665 🥰北部:@dsf74d 🥰中部:@kkkhh25 🥰南部:@dsf8dd 🥰 https://t.me/addlist/495_vGU9IP00Zjc1
叮噹 165/C/21歲 #雙北 精緻五官 活潑的學生 性愛經驗不多 需要被調教哦 白嫩的肌膚 靚麗外表 迷人曲線 外貌協會的首選 一級棒的服務讓你爽歪歪
❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dsf74d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 254,664 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dsf74d named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北部秘密花園” (@dsf74d), 36 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsf74d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.