Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SAT QB & Leaks

@dsatbank

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

912subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002037383298
TypeChannel
Username@dsatbank
DescriptionКанал с объяснениями задач SAT Question Bank & Leaks
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/dsatbank

Growth

912913912.57 Aug 2026, 15:37 — 913 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 912 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:02 — 912 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:378 Aug 2026, 01:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 912–913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:02912no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:17912-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:37913first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
361
Videos
1
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 06s
Average length
4m 06s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2890.3%
👍26.45%
🔥13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2024 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC380 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kanatvandal

https://youtu.be/icCyTC_4E-g Solving the circle problem from SAT June 2026 by completing the square. You should: - Distinguish between the Standard and the General forms of the equation of a circle. - Be able to convert between them using the completing the square method. All details are explained in a newly uploaded lesson on my free website — Equation of a Circle.

6 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC526 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kanatvandalPhoto

SAT Math 101 — Free Course Hi there, everyone! After months of work, I'm excited to finally release SAT Math 101 — a completely free SAT Math course built on Notion. The course combines written explanations and video lessons created by me, covering everything you need for SAT Math — and nothing you don't. - Unlike Khan Academy, the course explores SAT-specific topics in greater depth and with a stronger focus on

🔥1

19 Jul 2025, 14:59 UTC≈9,350 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kanatvandalVideo

Video Explanation from SAT Math Guide (With more than 300 problems&solutions) - A huge number of interesting/difficult problems, selected from official sources (leaks, practices) with 0% off-topic - The problems are distributed competently by topics and subtopics in order of increasing difficulty and cover the entire SAT syllabus More details here — https://t.me/vital_reviews/79

5

19 Jul 2025, 14:58 UTC≈7,770 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vital_reviews

Привет всем - Кто присутствовал на моих уроках, Office Hours, бесплатных вебинарах - Кто читал объяснения задач от меня в @kanatvandal и кому они очень нравились - Кто пользовался моим сборником задач по NUET Math 🔥 Теперь выходим на более высокий уровень и комбинируем это всё. Я выпускаю коммерческий Сборник задач по SAT Math — SAT Math Guide (aka Super Kanatvandal): - Огромное количество интересных/трудных задач,

5

20 Oct 2024, 16:48 UTC≈8,830 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vital_reviewsPhoto

#sat #lines Обычно когда мы видим такие задачи, мы сразу понимаем, что число перед x это change, а число правее это initial value. Но есть нюанс Правильный ответ: A Разбор задачи будет завтра

9👍2

16 Jul 2024, 17:14 UTC≈8,510 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У вас есть функция ax^2 - 2x + c Вы знаете, что f(1) = f(-13). Ввиду симметрии, вершина параболы h = -6 У нас в этой задаче явный акцент на вершину параболы, давайте воспользуемся Vertex form: a(x-h)^2 + k. Но h мы знаем, так что у нас a(x+6)^2 + k Мы с вами имеем ДВА уравнения одной и той же функции. Стало быть, получаем равенство ax^2 - 2x + c = a(x+6)^2 + k Можем раскрыть квадрат суммы, получаем ax^2 - 2x + c

3

16 Jun 2024, 16:46 UTC≈5,390 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Окей, постараюсь пилить каждую недельку по 4-5 решений

6

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dsatbank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SAT QB & Leaks” (@dsatbank), 912 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsatbank.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.