Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Der

Channel

Der

@drxxxh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

923subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810362926
TypeChannel
Username@drxxxh
Created3 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drxxxh

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

923942932.57 August 2026 — 942 subscribers8 August 2026 — 942 subscribers16 August 2026 — 939 subscribers22 August 2026 — 936 subscribers29 August 2026 — 932 subscribers6 September 2026 — 926 subscribers13 September 2026 — 925 subscribers28 September 2026 — 923 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 51 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 920–945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 00:18923-2
13 Sept 2026, 19:01925-1
6 Sept 2026, 23:41926-6
29 Aug 2026, 10:03932-4
22 Aug 2026, 18:38936-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:14939-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:50942no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:49942first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

867 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥53962.2%
🔥16118.6%
🥰14616.8%
💔212.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 867 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
374
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
374
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drxxxh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC244 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

родные, про вас не забываю. обещанный контент и кинутый ранее арт делаются. последняя неделя меня ужасно подкосила, в связи с чем взять в руки айпад у меня просто не хватало времени.🖤 из хороших новостей, несмотря на свою аллергию (с которой я борюсь как могу), у меня появился очаровательный второй кот мейн-кун. из неприятных - у малыша в день приезда были страшные сопли, текли глаза, и что самое ужасное - рахит, из…

❤‍🔥33💔16

20 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC469 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026

нет, я все понимаю. НО ВЫ СМОТРЮ НАЦЕЛЕНЫ ДАЖЕ СЕРЬЕЗНЕЕ ЧЕМ Я.

🔥42🥰17❤‍🔥11

20 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC462 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026

(вот и думайте потом, шучу или нет)

❤‍🔥42🥰16

20 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC468 views133 reactionsread 8 August 2026

давайте, 500 реакций и я впервые рисую их голыми.

❤‍🔥83🥰28🔥22

20 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC534 views235 reactions374 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ласково встречают друг друга после шести лет разлуки.

❤‍🔥143🔥50🥰42

15 Jul 2026, 23:27 UTC534 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

пока сердце разрывалось на части, в голове было: - рука, не подведи.

❤‍🔥34🥰9🔥8

15 Jul 2026, 23:24 UTC462 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

два часа пролетели незаметно. ;;слезы после увиденного в Мюнхене day2 все не стихают и периодически наворачиваются вновь. хотя это все еще не сравнится с тем, как по щекам текли слезы во время исполнения louder than bombs (когда эмоции были на жестком пределе). перед глазами буквально пролетели последние 11 лет жизни, с тех пор как начал слушать bts. это было сильно и чертовски больно. буду скучать за этими ощущения…

❤‍🔥31💔5🔥5🥰1

15 Jul 2026, 23:21 UTC432 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

louder than bombs I break.

❤‍🔥29🔥6🥰4

15 Jul 2026, 23:08 UTC392 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

как там говорят. дофаминовая яма? послеконцертная депрессия? вот я сейчас там.😭

❤‍🔥19🥰2

15 Jul 2026, 23:01 UTC413 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

I NEED. ;what you need, twin?

❤‍🔥41🔥5🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @drxxxh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

— ᴠᴋᴏᴏᴋ.
@vkook_gallery · 25,821
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Der” (@drxxxh), 923 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drxxxh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.