Channel
@druzyaovv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001942327507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @druzyaovv |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 10 July 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/druzyaovv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 28 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 28 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
332 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 135 | 40.7% | |
| custom 5346152548761868765 | 41 | 12.3% | |
| 🥰 | 28 | 8.43% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 7.83% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 5.42% | |
| custom 5373151022422178900 | 16 | 4.82% | |
| 🤡 | 15 | 4.52% | |
| custom 5298800676057398755 | 11 | 3.31% | |
| 🤓 | 8 | 2.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.11% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 2.11% | |
| custom 5310119641459206495 | 6 | 1.81% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.904% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.904% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.904% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.602% | |
| custom 5299028777475523047 | 1 | 0.301% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.301% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.301% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2023 to 12 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed 8818 drum kit CHROME
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed 8818 drum kit CHROME
мы
❤17
😈
custom 534615254876186876537custom 537315102242217890011❤8custom 52988006760573987554
всех девочек с 8 марта!🙂
❤21custom 53101196414592064956custom 52988006760573987554custom 53731510224221789004👍2
😳😳
❤9
как дела у вас, интернет 😵💫
❤6👎6👍3custom 52988006760573987552custom 52990287774755230471custom 53461525487618687651
победители розыгрыша 👽 1. аметрия 👾 2. парадокс 🤠 3. interlude 💀 4. we can held from отписать в лс соре за качество
🔥3❤2custom 52988006760573987551
РОЗЫГРЫШ НА 400 евраа 1 место: 100 2 место: 100 3 место: 100 4 место: 100 ники в комм. итоги завтра.
❤8custom 53461525487618687653❤🔥2🔥2
если честно я ебла ваш интернет и троллинг.все стало каким то не таким,как раньше. а ещё, откровенно не понимаю типов и чувих которые кидают нюдсы и фотки любят друг друга и мечтают встретиться.рассказывают свои секреты нахуй. и самое странное.похкй на страшил ебаных,которые выходят в социум только в роли посмешища и мишени для подъебов и издевательств. схуяли, вполне пиздатые люди, занимаются такой хуйней?
❤19🤡6🌚1👍1🔥1custom 53731510224221789001
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @druzyaovv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 902,162 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@druzyaovv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗟” (@druzyaovv), 28 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/druzyaovv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.