Channel
@drsychova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
789subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001582874001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drsychova |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drsychova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 789 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 791 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 791 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,806 |
| Reactions total | 127 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
127 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 55.1% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 11.8% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 9.45% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 5.51% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 5.51% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.787% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как перестать покупать одежду, которая не делает вас счастливее Вы заходите на маркетплейс, чтобы выбрать одну футболку, а через полчаса в корзине лежат три платья, брюки, которые «надо примерить», и пиджак, на который «надо ждать скидку». Вы знаете, что половину купленного вы не носите. Даете себе слово, что это последний раз, но через неделю снова открываете приложение, потому что там новая коллекция или акция по…
❤7
Какими бывают синдромы отмены антидепрессантов? Антидепрессанты — это не витамины. Их нельзя попить и бросить, даже если кажется, что все уже прошло и вы в порядке. Отмена антидепрессантов, особенно резкая и бесконтрольная, может запустить целый каскад состояний, к которым человек часто оказывается не готов просто потому, что его не предупредили. Рассказываю, какими бывают синдромы отмены и чем они отличаются друг о…
❤7💯2
Почему мы ревнуем к прошлому партнера Ревность к прошлому — это, пожалуй, самая иррациональная форма ревности. В отличие от ревности к настоящему, где есть реальный соперник, здесь угрозы вроде бы нет. Отношения закончены, партнер уверяет, что ничего не было или что все давно в прошлом, и возврата быть не может. Но вас это не успокаивает. Потому что вот это «а что, если» — оно и есть главный яд. Партнер может сто р…
❤13👍4💯2
В прошедшую субботу разбор книги «Венера в мехах» по техническим причинам не состоялся. Какое произведение обсудим на следующей встрече книжного клуба?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Если вы видели ролики, где мамы буквально зацеловывают своих взрослых сыновей, называют «мой маленький» и смотрят на них так, будто это их мужчина, а не ребенок, — и вы задавались вопросом: «Это вообще нормально? Или я чего-то не понимаю?», — то этот ролик для вас.
🔥6👍3
Ссылка на подключение: https://1h5so7w4.ktalk.ru/iuo8ktcjgy72
❤2
Сервис, который вас не любит Быть ребенком у любящей мамочки очень здорово. Тебя холят, лелеют, закрывают все твои потребности, ты даже не успеваешь рот открыть, а тебя уже поняли, накормили, одели, утешили и спать уложили. Ты не думаешь ни о чем, потому что о тебе уже подумали. Здорово ведь? Все хотят такую маму или папу. Такого человека, который все делает исключительно так, как надо тебе, который предугадывает ж…
❤12💯2👍1
Психотерапевт | Сычова Татьяна pinned a photo
Страдание как способ быть Есть люди, которые, кажется, живут по принципу «чем хуже, тем лучше». Они не просто терпят дискомфорт, они его бессознательно ищут. Они берут на себя чужую работу, хотя устали так, что не спят по ночам. Они не могут сказать «нет», а потом обижаются, что их используют. Они выбирают партнеров, которые их не ценят, и годами пытаются заслужить любовь, которую невозможно заслужить. Мазохистичес…
❤8💯3
Как стать психологом, который готов к первым клиентам? Профессия психолога — это не только большой багаж теории, но и умение взаимодействовать с реальными клиентами. Зачастую студентам не хватает реального опыта практики и качественной супервизии от специалистов. Поэтому мы запускаем программу профессиональной переподготовки «Практикующий психолог» от центра «ЭмоциУМ». Это годовой практико-ориентированный курс, где…
❤3
4 психолога приходится на 100 000 человек в России Такую цифру я увидела на одной из лекций для врачей. И, честно говоря, она меня совсем не удивила. Как руководитель центра психотерапии и психиатрии, я не понаслышке знаю, насколько сложно сегодня найти действительно хорошего специалиста. Я бы даже так сказала: нехватка кадров — проблема №1 в сфере ментального здоровья. При этом запрос на психологическую помощь ра…
🔥5❤1
Представьте, что вы приходите к психиатру с тревогой. Вы устали, плохо спите, вам кажется, что с вами что-то не так. А через полгода вы уходите от этого же врача с диагнозом «диссоциативное расстройство личности» и воспоминаниями о сатанинских ритуалах, в которых вас якобы заставляли участвовать в детстве. Ничего этого не было, но вы уже верите, и ваша психика послушно выстроила альтернативную биографию, населив ее …
😱7❤4👍4😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @drsychova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В прошедшую субботу разбор книги «Венера в мехах» по техническим причинам не состоялся. Какое произведение обсудим на следующей встрече книжного клуба?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 108,474 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психотерапевт | Сычова Татьяна” (@drsychova), 789 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drsychova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.