(8−Original Score)×0.50+Original Score=Final Score
❤1
Signed Koorosh Parviz

Channel
@drparviz_psy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
196subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001450471689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drparviz_psy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drparviz_psy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 196 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 198 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 199 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 199 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 20 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(8−Original Score)×0.50+Original Score=Final Score
❤1
Signed Koorosh Parviz
✨ استیو جابز معتقد بود: «هوش واقعی در وصل کردن نقاطی است که دیگران نمیبینند.» یعنی توانایی دیدن ارتباط بین چیزهایی که در ظاهر هیچ ربطی به هم ندارند. 🔹 هر تجربه جدید یک نقطه تازه است. 🔹 هر ارتباطی که بسازی، مسیر تازهای برای خلاقیت باز میکند. 📌 پس برای باهوشتر شدن، فقط دنبال افزایش IQ نباش؛ به دنبال تجربههای متنوع باش و یاد بگیر آنها را به هم وصل کنی.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
❓ سوال روز استیو جابز هوش واقعی را در چه چیزی میدانست؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
طبیعتا جهت شرکت در این طرح دانشجویان یا فارغ الحتصیلان کارشناسی ارشد در اولویت هستند.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
📣 همراهان گرامی، سلام دعوتنامهای از ستاد مبارزه با مواد مخدر ریاست جمهوری (دفتر تحقیقات و آموزش) جهت همکاری در طرحی مرتبط با تحقیقات و آموزش در حوزه پیشگیری از اعتیاد دریافت شده است. در صورت دارا بودن دسترسی و امکان جمعآوری دادههای میدانی، از جمله همکاری با مراکز ترک اعتیاد و بازپروری، و نیز داشتن زمان کافی برای مشارکت، لطفاً رزومه یا بیانیه تواناییهای خود را برای اینجانب ارسال فرمایید.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
البته در متن اصلی مقاله به درمان روانکاوی اشاره نشده اما درمان روانکاوی همیشه از موثرترین روشهای رواندرمانی هست.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
اختلال دوقطبی چیست؟ اختلال دوقطبی یک بیماری روانی مزمن است که باعث نوسانات شدید خلقی میشود، از جمله دورههای "بالا" (مانیا یا هیپومانیا) و "پایین" (افسردگی). این اختلال حدود ۲-۳٪ جمعیت جهان را تحت تأثیر قرار میدهد و معمولاً در سنین ۲۰-۲۵ سالگی شروع میشود، اما ممکن است در نوجوانی یا سنین بالاتر ظاهر شود. انواع اختلال دوقطبی بایپولار I: حداقل یک دوره مانیا (شدید، حداقل ۷ روز) که ممکن است نیاز به بستری داشته باشد، و …
Signed Koorosh Parviz
سلام دوستان. در طول ترم تلاش میکنم سوالات در راستای دروس مختلف روانشتاسی باشه به طوری که برای دانشجویان آموزنده باشه. بنابراین سعی کنید سوالات را با سایر دانشجویان از دانشگاههای مختلف شیر کنید استفاده کنند. https://t.me/drparviz_psy
Signed Koorosh Parviz
سوال روز : آسیبشناسی روانی در نوع II اختلال دوقطبی، تفاوت اصلی با نوع I چیست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
کدام فناوری نوین میتواند به تشخیص زودهنگام تغییرات خلقی در بیماران دوقطبی کمک کند؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
شعری بسیار زیبا درباره فضای مجازی از شاعر بزرگ گیلانغربی سید محمد پرور. حتما ببینید و از دقت و عمق توصیفات روانشناختیش لذت ببرید. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOwUtNoiDC_/?igsh=MWxyOW1qZzB1ZHVmdA==
❤1
Signed Koorosh Parviz
📣 دوسنانی که برای کودکان و نوجوانانشان نیاز به استعدادیابی عمیق دارن مخصوصا در ایام انتخاب رشته و دانشگاه می توانتد از خدمات ما بهرمند شوند.
Signed Koorosh Parviz
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drparviz_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓ سوال روز استیو جابز هوش واقعی را در چه چیزی میدانست؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سوال روز : آسیبشناسی روانی در نوع II اختلال دوقطبی، تفاوت اصلی با نوع I چیست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام فناوری نوین میتواند به تشخیص زودهنگام تغییرات خلقی در بیماران دوقطبی کمک کند؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 20 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 58,752 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال اطلاع رسانی دکتر کورش پرویز” (@drparviz_psy), 196 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drparviz_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.