Сделали бы такую заморозку? 🥶
- Да21%
- Нет50%
- 👀29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@drnataliachigrova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
908subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001784081695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drnataliachigrova |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drnataliachigrova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 908 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 906 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 905 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 909 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 909 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
426 reactions across 16 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 148 | 34.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 84 | 19.7% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 10.8% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 8.22% | |
| 🥰 | 28 | 6.57% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 2.58% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 2.11% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 2.11% | |
| 😨 | 8 | 1.88% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 1.64% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 1.64% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 1.64% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 1.41% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 🙉 | 4 | 0.939% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.469% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.469% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.469% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.469% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.235% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.704% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 426 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сделали бы такую заморозку? 🥶
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Привет вам из Петербурга, мои дорогие! Думаю, вы знаете, что современные девушки на раз-два замораживают яйцеклетки на будущее. Это даже можно сделать по ОМС. Мода на заморозку нарастает, в Москве уже говорят о ЗАМОРОЗКЕ ФИБРОБЛАСТОВ. 🧬 Что такое банк фибробластов и как это работает Процедура выглядит так: у вас берут небольшой кусочек кожи (обычно заушная область, где минимальное фотостарение), в лаборатории выд…
❤8❤🔥6👍5
Хорошая новость про сыворотки для ресниц 👆
🕊3😍3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥18🥰6😍4🙏2
Video message, posted without a caption
😨8🤯7😱5🙉4
Плохая новость про сыворотки для роста ресниц 👆
🐳2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤13❤🔥2💔1🕊1
Доброе утро, друзья 🌞 в Москве жара! Завтракаю, думаю о гипергидрозе (профдеформация, что делать) Гипергидроз, проще говоря, повышенная потливость - для многих это просто катастрофа. Пятна на одежде, вечно влажные подмышки, невозможность носить светлое, запах — всё это подтачивает самооценку похлеще любой морщины. Ботулинотерапия - золотой стандарт коррекции гипергидроза. Манипуляция абсолютно безопасная, эффект пр…
🥰14❤9🍓7🐳2👍2❤🔥1💋1
🧬 Что такого ценного в сперме лосося? PDRN расшифровывается как полидезоксирибонуклеотиды. Это фрагменты ДНК длиной от 50 до 2000 пар оснований, которые получают из гонадной ткани лососевых рыб. Да, маркетологи любят формулировку «сперма лосося», звучит броско, что уж там. Но на самом деле сырье проходит многоступенчатую очистку, и в финальный продукт попадают именно очищенные цепочки ДНК. ДНК лосося по молекулярно…
❤19🔥7🌚6🐳3
Доброе утро! Мне кажется мы как-то давно не говорили о сперме лосося. А тема вечная, вон еще советские девчонки что-то подобное обсуждали. Самая известная поклонница ингредиента — Ким Кардашьян. Она не раз публично рассказывала, что использует сыворотки с полинуклеотидами для восстановления кожи и даже показывала процедуру salmon sperm facial в своих соцсетях. Ее эстетист Тошка Барри, активно продвигает корейские пр…
❤16🥰5❤🔥4😍2
Ловите памятку по санскринам: 1. Современные врачи призывают защищаться от солнца круглый год (хотя ВОЗ разрешает не наносить защиту при УФ-индексе 1-2). UVA-лучи проходят сквозь облака и стёкла. Нет света — нет нужды в SPF. Есть свет — есть UVA (а именно они причина фотостарения). 2. Сидите у окна — мажьтесь. Стекло блокирует UVB, но не UVA. Если ваше рабочее место у окна или вы автомобилист, вы получаете дозу фот…
❤🔥14❤11👌5🕊1
Привет, друзья! Вчера снялась для Москва 24 на пляже Лужников. Впервые была на пляже в белом халате😅 (люблю эпатаж)
❤🔥22🔥9❤7🥰3👍2🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drnataliachigrova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сделали бы такую заморозку? 🥶
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что выбираете для себя?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как вам такой препарат?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Скажите честно, слишком много БУКВ? 👆
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 15 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Chigrova” (@drnataliachigrova), 908 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drnataliachigrova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.