Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

מיכאל בן ארי

@drmichaelbenari_il

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

149subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001452027593
TypeChannel
Username@drmichaelbenari_il
Descriptionmichael ben ari
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/drmichaelbenari_il

Growth

1496 August 2026 — 149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 149 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148–150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:02149no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:47149first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,990
Videos
2,490
Links
15,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 14s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2025 to 2 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2025, 19:54 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @TheSoldiers_Voi: שחררו את סער אופיר!

2 Nov 2025, 19:54 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @honenu1: לוחמי כוח מאה מגיבים לראשונה: "יש רק אמת אחת - אנחנו ננצח" 4 מלוחמי כוח מאה הנאשמים בפרשת שדה תימן מגיבים לראשונה לפרישת הפצ"רית והחקירה בפרשה - "עשיתם לנו משפט שדה מול המצלמות, אנחנו לא נשתוק. נמשיך להילחם על הצדק. אנחנו ננצח כי יש רק אמת אחת". >>

2 Nov 2025, 19:54 UTC49 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @YBunzel78: תזכורת עצובה לסיפור עצוב אחר שנגמר אחרת ומי יתן את הדין ?

2 Nov 2025, 19:54 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @MicahAvni: תקשיבי עד הסוף. עוד דוגמא כואבת לכך שצריך ועדת חקירה ממלכתית – לא פחות – להתנהלותו של כל המערך המשפטי בשירות המדינה. המערכת שאמורה להגן על הדמוקרטיה, הפכה לגוף חסין מביקורת. גוף שמקבל החלטות הרות גורל, בלי אחריות ציבורית ובלי שקיפות. במקום לשמור על החוק – הם הפכו לשחקנים בזירה הפוליטית. הם מדליפים לתקשורת, משפיעים על דעת הקהל, ומקדמים אג׳נדות פוליטיות – הכול תחת מסווה של

2 Nov 2025, 19:54 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) איש היחצ של תומר ירושלמי - גאון!

2 Nov 2025, 15:41 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @moshefeiglin: משפטו של חכ"ל לשעבר ד"ר מיכאל בן ארי נמשך, ועל רקע פרשת הפצ"רית ניתן רק לתהות מהיא האג'נדה שהובילה לפסילתו מהתמודדות לכנסת. @drmichaelbenari

2 Nov 2025, 15:41 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) הסזון המשפטי 20: הדיווח מבית המשפט על דיון ההוכחות יא מרחשוון תשפו 2.11.2025. אנא שתפו

👍1

1 Nov 2025, 19:22 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @mennyassyag: זה חברים אחד הגיבורים שמגיעות לו הרבה תודות על המאבק שלו למען הלוחמים, וכאן הוא מספר על גיבור אחר (סער אופיר) שגם אותו רודפים שונאי הלוחמים בפצ״ריה. תודה לך אחינו רן.

1 Nov 2025, 19:21 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026

‌ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) הסזון המשפטי 19: עדכון - מחר 2.11 עוד דיון הוכחות ב׳משפט ההסתה׳, מחר אחקור את קצין המשטרה שחקר אותי על האזהרות מפני השביעי באוקטובר, אשאל אותו שאלות נוקבות. מצ״ב את העדכון וגם על משפט נוסף שנפתח לי אצל שופט אחר, כי ביקשתי גילוי מסמכים... שבוע טוב אנא שתפו https://youtu.be/wNQ61uzvg5s?si=GV0p16HDMNPomuU3

1 Nov 2025, 19:21 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026

ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @AyeletMM: כשמאלנית לשעבר שהצביעה לרבין אני פטורה בזאת מההצגה של נקיפות מצפון. תקראו לי כשסוף סוף השמאל יערוך טקס זיכרון ל-1500 נרצחי הסכמי אוסלו כי לי ולכל השמאל יש הרבה דם על הידיים. עד אז, תחסכו ממני את הצביעות.

1 Nov 2025, 19:21 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026

‌ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @akibigman: המשפט הזה הוא אחד האירועים החשובים ביותר של התקופה. תמצית הקונספציה. חובה לצפות ולעקוב.

1 Nov 2025, 19:21 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026

‌ד״ר מיכאל בן ארי🇮🇱 (Twitter) RT @ErelSegal: אחרי שדה תימן זה ברור בית המשפט העליון, בית המשפח של הדיפסטייט לא יכול למנות ועדת חקירה בית המשפח צריך להיחקר על אחריותו בהפקרת לוחמי צהל

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drmichaelbenari_il. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,301,868 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“מיכאל בן ארי” (@drmichaelbenari_il), 149 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drmichaelbenari_il.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.