прошу максимально распространить!❤️🔥

Channel
журнал
@dressmeetsbody_journalism
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
240subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002409774957 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dressmeetsbody_journalism |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dressmeetsbody_journalism |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 240 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 239 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 238 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 239 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 240 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 242 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 242 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
такие бирки могут присутствовать на Né-net "мейнлайн" , фейк на эту линейку мной замечен не был.
надеюсь, этот пост помог вам разобраться в линейках Né-net и отличить оригинал от фейков. прошу максимально распространить эту информацию, чтобы меньше людей попадалось на подделки. если остались вопросы — спрашивайте в лс @KOTHEHET, помогу разобраться. берегите кошельки и покупайте только проверенные вещи у меня @dressmeetsbody и других хороших людей !
ニャー😺 ( Nya )
сейчас в россии рынок японской одежды, особенно бренда Né-net, сильно искажён. причина — огромное количество подделок и недобросовестных продавцов, которые этим пользуются. главная проблема — российские перепродажи на avito и прочих площадках полно продавцов, которые: покупают подделку в основном на ニャー😺 ( Nya ) (чаще всего с taobao и goofish). выставляют её по цене оригинала. в описании уверяют, что вещь оригинал. в…
подделки делают в основном на ニャー😺 ( Nya ). на китайских маркетплейсах есть варианты разного качества: от дешёвых, бросающихся в глаза, до копий, которые трудно отличить от оригинала без опыта. есть даже подделки на вещи, которых в оригинале никогда не существовало (особенно рюкзаки и сумки). большинство рюкзаков и сумок nya, продающихся на avito, — это 100% фейки. про бутлег по 2к вообще молчу, хоть сами напечатайте…
итак вот примеры бирок, чтобы сразу было понятно, с чем имеем дело: на подделках кривые швы, перекошенные логотипы и тупые детали. оригинальные сделаны аккуратно, с ровной строчкой и чёткими деталями. многие даже не понимают, что покупают китайский шлак за те же деньги, что просят за оригинал. если сомневаетесь — смотрите на бирки, качество пошива. лучше сто раз проверить, чем переплатить за вещь, которая разлезет…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @dressmeetsbody_journalism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dressmeetsbody_journalism named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“журнал” (@dressmeetsbody_journalism), 240 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dressmeetsbody_journalism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.