Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DreamZap

Channel

DreamZap

@dreamzap

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001987604250
TypeChannel
Username@dreamzap
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dreamzap

Growth

1207 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:01120no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:41120first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
124
Videos
6
Links
79

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤝2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пак на 50$ от браузерки дедлайн 1 час В последнее время море браузерок на солане дают не плохо прикурить на старте. Дают на 50$ пак за ретвит в Х + DS (не проверяют). Можно по фану с твинка забрать, не конектим мейн кошельки, ничего не вкладываем или на ВАШ DYOR.

4 Sept 2025, 16:21 UTC131 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

$DOGEMON x2 is, let's move on to millions CTUKtuWxY1cX35brrGmGv5kbbKPkQHC1isrN5gRSpump

4 Sept 2025, 12:45 UTC75 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

$DOGEMON 300k Gamble!!! good dip CTUKtuWxY1cX35brrGmGv5kbbKPkQHC1isrN5gRSpump

4 Sept 2025, 02:12 UTC60 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Phanes_botPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

3 Sept 2025, 14:00 UTC54 viewsread 9 August 2026

HOLY SHIT THIS IS REAL ? https://x.com/thebuckyouwill/status/1963072638655570149?s=46

3 Sept 2025, 14:00 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026

All news must talk about it soon 100k Chp53HVmU6odzDR8PYGPTDcf4CHGAf94EqMfV7dmpump

3 Sept 2025, 12:55 UTC54 viewsread 9 August 2026

My Personal Thesis on #PokeSol and Its Potential 1. Strong Narrative – Pokémon is hot worldwide - Pokémon is currently booming again: anime, games, RWA trading cards, and TikTok/X trends are everywhere. - The RWA Pokémon project previously hit an ATH of 320M MC, proving this narrative has massive pumping power in crypto. - That makes PokeSol more than just another random meme – it’s directly tied to a global hot tr

3 Sept 2025, 12:34 UTC45 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

$PokeSol Be ready for the next takeoff HGwdb6RQsMTqXpjBiy5BEAXHcpanmJr3c1Dj84r5pump

3 Sept 2025, 10:40 UTC41 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Phanes_botPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

3 Sept 2025, 09:17 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

new ath $Pokesol HGwdb6RQsMTqXpjBiy5BEAXHcpanmJr3c1Dj84r5pump

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dreamzap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 758,205 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DreamZap” (@dreamzap), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dreamzap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.