Channel
@dreamdip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002057798613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dreamdip |
| Description | 𝑾𝑬𝑳𝑪𝑶𝑴𝑬 𝑻𝑶 𝑫𝑰𝑷 ,, 🖤 — @amrmila |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dreamdip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 37 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 37 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dreamdip. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2025 to 28 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧿‘’ NEW INFORMATION ───────────── от проекта luxury открывается группа для общения,в которую сможет попасть почти каждый,после общения там,у вас появится больше шансов и возможности попасть в наш основной состав » для того,чтобы вступить к нам,вам нужно написать в бот,а после дождаться ссылки @skrmmnn_bot » вступить сможет не только влд той или иной рк,но и уч. все,что от вас требуется это указать где вы состоите…
в люкс теперь будет выкладываться материал для монтажа,сдт,поэтому подписывайтесь
‘’ NEW SDT — @luxuryprj
🤩‘’ NEW INFORMATION ───────────── — теперь на нашем канале вы сможете увидеть следующее » стикеры » сдт + материал для монтажа » акк девушек,которые вы сможете использовать в качестве своих персов а также множество других интерактивов и игр
🕊️’’ THE SET is OPEN ───────────── наш проект нацелен на общение между владельцами различных ркф,чтобы попасть к нам нужно выполнить некоторые условия : — сделать рп на свой канал — быть подписанным на канал люкса — в бот написать ваш тгк и кем вы там являетесь @skrmmnn_bot
на этом всем,я закрываю дип,удачи вам всем!! со сферы я не ухожу,буду здесь @luxuryprj
Signed skrmn
✦ NEW VIDEO • creator — милана id • наша?
Signed skrmn
вчера дип было три года!
Signed skrmn
рп
Signed skrmn
. INTERVIEW FOR LUXURY ,, 🩶 [ 02.06.2025] — с этого дня мы начинаем брать интервью у влд ркф поучаствовать в интервью от @luxuryprj сможет каждый,даже тот кто не состоит в нашем проекте,все,что вам нужно это подписаться на наш канал каждую неделю будут выходить интервью с известными вам владельцами/админами,если вам понравилась идея,то поставьте много реакций
Signed skrmn
как же мне приятно получать такие видео от моих любимых девочек,просто,люблю вас очень сильно бежевая мама и квадратный админ,я рада,что уже долгое время мы идем рука об руку,поддерживаем друг друга,имеем хорошую коммуникацию и в принципе я рада иметь с вами какое либо дело,я вижу в вас очень хороших и открытых людях,с которыми я хочу общаться всегда
Signed skrmn
✦ NEW VIDEO • creator — милана id • наша?
Signed skrmn
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dreamdip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 509,985 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dreamdip named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑫𝑰𝑷” (@dreamdip), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dreamdip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.