Channel
@drayv_i_razvitie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001882029195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drayv_i_razvitie |
| Description | Вебинары ЭШЭР и Метаверситет. Только анонс + запись вебинара. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drayv_i_razvitie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 43 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 43 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 55.6% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 February 2024 to 14 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Круглый стол на БРЁ2024 "Как играть в науку", спасибо Дяде Славе за запись, а уважаемым собеседникам за диалог. В особенности спасибо Анкерайту и Борису Фетисову, которые меня проблематизировали и развивали мысль Преза к нему - вот Классическая статья Флорана "как играть науку" - вот Запись вчерашнего вебинара тоже выложена, см пост выше #наука
👍1
2025 01 07 почему одни играют а другие нет https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhTM_-8n-Fc https://rutube.ru/video/6fa100aea9c3e148d7b8889f1cc83ed8/
Праздник и смысл https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DIzY7VpWVw&ab_channel=MikhailZabelin
👍1
Апология сюжетного мышления Агни Соколова и Миша Забелин в БИРО рассказывают о сюжетном мышлении. Хотим ответить максимально просто (но не проще простого:) на 4 вопроса: — Что такое сюжетное мышление? Можно сказать что оно про умение «схватывать» сюжет и делать это по отношению к жизни, а не только к искусству. Можно сказать, что это умение создавать сюжет жизни — Как оно помогает понимать людей? Оно у вас есть уже,…
аудио из БИРО. Апология сюжетного мышления.
🥰2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRrbTX3tznI Игры в библиотеках. 10.09.2024. БИРО
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kStqsJCbn3E
File, posted without a caption
#Сюжетное_мышление и взрослость/взросление. Поговорим о том, как они связаны. Вкратце: сюжетное мышление даёт возможность осмыслять происходящее с вами на разных уровнях. А взрослый - тот кто способен любить и осмыслять свою жизнь. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-_dllY9jpA 00:00:00 Определение взрослости • Способность любить и наполнять жизнь смыслом как основа взрослости. 00:01:46 Любовь и смысл • Влияние любв…
😁1
#источники_власти Понятие «ситуация» В этом году мы решили в качестве сквозной "красной нити" через тренинг "Источники власти" пропустить понятие "ситуация". До этого мы рассматривали происходящее через призму динамики группы. Но теперь хотим смотреть через схему "импульс - предоставление пространства - структура - наполнение структуры - точка - освоение точки", посмотреть на тренинг целиком и на его части. Беседу…
#источники_власти https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TfYuctMbK4 запись и таймкоды Власть: способность менять или противодействовать изменению 00:00:02 Обсуждение источников власти и сюжетного мышления 00:07:09 Создание своей жизни и жизни других 00:10:55 Важность целостности жизни 00:14:21 Жизнь и ее влияние 00:20:00 Жизнь и работа 00:23:48 Различия в мышлении о жизни 00:31:28 Определение власти 00:34:15 Создание про…
Круглый стол «Как стать хорошим игроком: трансляция состояния»: что можно сказать о том, как быть харизматиком, в каком смысле на игре проще вести за собой, а в каком сложнее. Поговорили вдохновенно. Каждый раз думаю, что есть же наверно «эталонные», «всем известные» игроки. А они да, есть, но в каждой тусовке свои. Интересно, что при переходе из тусовки в тусовки нужно адаптироваться, и что было безумно круто в одно…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @drayv_i_razvitie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 629,742 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Драйв и развитие” (@drayv_i_razvitie), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drayv_i_razvitie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.