Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

рисую не думаю

@draw_dont_think

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

236subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603901004
TypeChannel
Username@draw_dont_think
Descriptionрисую и пишу про то, как рисую связаться — @exxcuseme https://t.me/hangitonthewall
Created13 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/draw_dont_think

Growth

2367 Aug 2026, 16:02 — 236 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 236 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:028 Aug 2026, 10:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–237 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:01236no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:02236first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
340
Videos
6
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

421 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524493556275794081813030.9%
custom 52426375319162819258520.2%
custom 52448385394467250788019.0%
custom 5287275389016625591429.98%
custom 5244577349600554085368.55%
custom 5199850724116145597255.94%
custom 5244884572906203569174.04%
custom 528743809526270141361.43%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 12:17 UTC152 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

новый квадрат

custom 524493556275794081828custom 519985072411614559717custom 52448385394467250789custom 52445773496005540852custom 52874380952627014131

28 Jun 2026, 12:58 UTC323 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 524493556275794081817custom 524263753191628192515custom 52448385394467250788custom 52448845729062035694custom 51998507241161455973custom 52874380952627014132

23 May 2026, 10:42 UTC300 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dorararapostPhoto

любимые штучки в гостях у @draw_dont_think

custom 524493556275794081812custom 528727538901662559111custom 52448385394467250786custom 52448845729062035691

8 May 2026, 12:51 UTC366 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

иванчай прошлогодний

custom 524263753191628192518custom 524483853944672507815custom 52872753890166255917custom 52448845729062035693

15 Apr 2026, 07:18 UTC393 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nastengraphPhoto

Графики XIX века часто изображали данные как пейзажи. На картинках сравнение высот гор или длины рек в виде целой картины. Красивое 🌟

custom 52445773496005540858custom 52426375319162819257custom 51998507241161455975custom 52449355627579408181

26 Mar 2026, 08:32 UTC389 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @orientalbookcoverPhoto

[винтажный калькулятор экспозиции (также называемый экспозиционной таблицей) китайской марки puguang, китай, 1960-1970-е годы]

custom 524483853944672507816custom 524493556275794081815

17 Mar 2026, 17:04 UTC410 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

я рисовала это год

custom 524263753191628192545custom 524493556275794081816custom 52448385394467250788custom 52874380952627014133custom 52445773496005540852custom 52448845729062035692custom 52872753890166255911

8 Mar 2026, 13:19 UTC453 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

и любимый февральский. всех с праздником 🤍

custom 524493556275794081825custom 528727538901662559120custom 52448845729062035695

8 Mar 2026, 13:18 UTC627 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2526

custom 524457734960055408524custom 524493556275794081813custom 52448385394467250783custom 52448845729062035692

11 Feb 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,040 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

приглашаю всех в мой канал в max, чтобы не теряться после блокировок

custom 524483853944672507815custom 52449355627579408183custom 52872753890166255913

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @draw_dont_think. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,069,764 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“рисую не думаю” (@draw_dont_think), 236 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/draw_dont_think.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.