Channel
@drapesh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
566subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001823892417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drapesh |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drapesh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 566 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 566 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
598 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 244 | 40.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 136 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5285525984412463881 | 123 | 20.6% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 6.52% | |
| custom 5438612388507054902 | 30 | 5.02% | |
| 💔 | 26 | 4.35% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drapesh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 February 2026 to 5 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
привет из соседнего фандома. карты говорили мне не торопиться, действовать по наитию, ждать знака и... я дождалась сразу трех. буду краткой. битва больше не вдохновляет меня на создание эдитов так же мощно, как раньше, поэтому я бодренько переметнулась на блогерскую сторону. изначально планировалась кардинальная реорганизация этого канала, но чем интенсивнее я себе ее представляла, тем отчетливее понимала, что это…
💔25❤12🔥5
с праздником, самые прекрасные, смелые, уверенные и неповторимые дамы! берегите себя и свое здоровье и никогда не сомневайтесь в своих силах. я абсолютно точно знаю, что вам по плечу достижение любой поставленной цели ❤️
❤26custom 543861238850705490216custom 528552598441246388113❤🔥4
ребята, ситуация следующая: новый сезон и новые лица в нем не особо сильно меня бустанули, поэтому сижу делаю простенькие пятиминутки масленникову (и планирую делать с ним еще больше), но вам не показываю, потому что сомневаюсь. пришла спрашивать прямо, как вы относитесь к фандомной мешанине в эдиторских каналах? интересно ли вам будет смотреть мои работы не только по битве чаще нескольких раз в год? за искреннее спа…
❤🔥24❤13custom 528552598441246388112💔1
ощущаю какую-то вселенскую несправедливость
custom 528552598441246388112❤3
фанфакт с логикой "есть одно общее слово": из-за того, что я сейчас усердно пересматриваю сверхов, дженни своей работой с оливковым маслом ассоциируется у меня с архангелами (особенно с родным и любимым габриэлем), у которых огонь из святого масла — одна из слабостей
❤13
осторожно ступаю в новый сезон. в краша не вкрашилась, фаворит не определен, но симпатии имеются #битваэкстрасенсов // #дженнифербьянки х 𝙗𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙣𝙚𝙮 𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 — 𝙘𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙪𝙨 сс: woodlfilms ваш фидбэк в реакциях/репостах/комментариях очень важен и ценен для меня 🌟
❤🔥25❤15custom 528552598441246388115
подскажите, какую эмоцию юзать, я не понимаю
(Вы хотите сказать, что женщина, представившаяся учителем Сакова, принесла сперму Череватого, с помощью которой будет проходить испытание??)
с самого начала трансляция шла как по маслу, стоило только бесову выйти, как все крашнулось. совпадение? не думаю
❤🔥8❤3
ощущаю багажники этим мемом
❤8🔥4custom 52855259844124638814
искренне извиняюсь за простой в эдитах, но я села пересматривать 15 сезонов сверхъестественного, параллельно ковыряя какие-то графические штуки чисто для себя, и никак не могу оторваться. дай бог новые лица в новом сезоне всколыхнут во мне желание систематически делать именно эдиты, а не черт знает что, но сомнение, честно говоря, присутствует, и пока имеем что имеем
❤19❤🔥7
я там пофиксила на полную версию, а то, оказывается, глюком съело не только макса, но еще и илюху, и очень красивую даму
❤17
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drapesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 391,489 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бэш студио” (@drapesh), 566 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drapesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.