Channel
@dralmasimd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+83 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004419895755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dralmasimd |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 18 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dralmasimd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 98 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 109 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 107 | +91 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 16 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 15 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 200 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
16 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 93.8% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پاسخ سوال یکی از مخاطبا: ببین میفهمم چقدر خستهکنندهست که هر علامت کوچیک دوباره همون ترس قدیمی رو روشن کنه. ولی چیزی که تو توضیح دادی فقط «ترس از پارکینسون» نیست؛ یه چرخه هم کنارش شکل گر فته: علامت ⬅️ ترس ⬅️ سرچکردن ⬅️ یه کم آرامش ⬅️ شک دوباره اگه علامت جدید یا مداومی داری، طبیعتاً باید از نظر پزشکی بررسی بشه. ولی اگه بارها بررسی شدی و باز با هر علامت کوچیک وارد سرچ و ترس میشی، خودِ این چرخه اضطراب سلامت هم …
❤2
میخوای یه تصمیم بگیری. اول یه کم فکر میکنی. بعد دوباره مزایا و معایب رو میچینی. از یکی میپرسی. یه بار دیگه سرچ میکنی. و هنوز: «نکنه انتخاب اشتباهی کنم؟» اینجا گاهی مشکل کمبود اطلاعات نیست… ذهنت دنبال اطمینان قبل از انتخابه. شک ⬅️ فکر بیشتر ⬅️ اطمینان کوتاه ⬅️ یه «نکنه» جدید دفعه بعد قبل از یه دور فکرِ دیگه، از خودت بپرس: «اطلاعات جدید لازم دارم؟ یا فقط میخوام مطمئن شم اشتباه نمیکنم؟» تو بیشتر با تص…
❤1
گاهی همه چیزی که میخوام همینه: یه اتاق ساکت، یه کاغذ و قلم، و چند ساعت خلوت برای فکر کردن به چیزایی که واقعاً برام مهمن. نه آدمای بیشتر. نه شلوغی بیشتر. فقط کمی سکوت. 🙂↕️🕊️ @dralmasimd
❤1
اگه امروز یه اشتباه کردی و ذهنت سریع گفت: «باز خراب کردم…» به خودت بگو: من یه اشتباه کردم؛ قرار نیست ازش درباره کل خودم نتیجه بگیرم. @dralmasimd
❤2
یه اشتباه کوچیک میکنی. مثلاً یه چیزی یادت میره. اولین فکرت این نیست که: «اشتباه کردم.» میگی: «من چرا همیشه اینجوریم؟» و همینجا ماجرا عوض میشه. دیگه داری درباره اون اشتباه فکر نمیکنی… داری درباره خودت قضاوت میکنی. اشتباه ⬅️ «من کافی نیستم» ⬅️ خودخوری ⬅️ تلاش برای جبران دفعه بعد فقط جملهت رو عوض کن: نه: «من خراب کردم.» بگو: «این قسمت رو بد انجام دادم.» فرق کوچیکیه؛ ولی یکی درباره رفتاره، یکی درباره…
اگه یه کاری رو عقب انداختی چون حس کردی: «هنوز آماده نیستم…» به خودت بگو: لازم نیست شروع من کامل باشه. گاهی فقط باید نسخه ناقصِ قدم اول رو بردارم. @dralmasimd
❤1
میخوای یه کاری رو شروع کنی. ولی قبلش میگی: «بذار یکم بیشتر آماده شم.» یه ویدیو دیگه میبینی. یه برنامه بهتر میچینی. یه کم بیشتر تحقیق میکنی. و چند روز میگذره… هنوز شروع نکردی. اینجا شاید مشکل تنبلی نباشه. گاهی ذهنت میگه: «اگه شروع کنم، باید خوب از آب دربیاد.» ترس از بد شروعکردن ⬅️ آمادهشدن بیشتر ⬅️ عقبانداختن ⬅️ آرامش موقت دفعه بعد فقط ۱۰ دقیقه نسخه بدِ کار رو شروع کن. نه کامل. فقط شروعشده. اگه …
❤1
اگه بعد از یه جمع، ذهنت شروع کرد تکتک حرفهات رو مرور کردن: «نکنه بد گفتم؟» «نکنه برداشتشون عوض شد؟» به خودت بگو: من لازم نیست هر مکالمهای رو بعداً دوباره محاکمه کنم. تموم شده. میتونم رهاش کنم. @dralmasimd
❤1
از جمع برمیگردی خونه. همهچی خوب بوده. ولی یهو یادت میاد یه چیزی گفتی. «چرا اینو گفتم؟» بعد یکی دیگه: «نکنه بد برداشت کرد؟» و کمکم کل جمع رو دوباره توی ذهنت پخش میکنی. اینجا ذهنت دنبال فهمیدن گذشته نیست… دنبال اطمینانه که اشتباهی نکردی. شک ⬅️ مرور حرفها ⬅️ یه جواب موقت ⬅️ شک بعدی و یه مکالمه ۳۰ دقیقهای، ممکنه ساعتها ادامه پیدا کنه. اگه میخوای این چرخههای ذهنی رو متوقف کنی میتونی با فرستادن کلمه “تح…
❤1
اگه خستهای و همین که میشینی استراحت کنی، ذهنت میگه: «الان بقیه دارن جلو میزنن.» به خودت بگو: استراحت، عقب افتادن نیست. من لازم نیست با سرعت بقیه زندگی کنم. @dralmasimd
❤1
از صبح کار کردی. بالاخره میگی: «دیگه بسه…» میشینی. گوشی رو باز میکنی و میبینی یکی هنوز داره کار میکنه. همون لحظه با خودت میگی: «من چرا نشستم؟» و اینجا یه چیز مهم اتفاق میافته: ذهنت استراحت رو با عقبافتادن قاطی کرده. استراحت ⬅️ عذاب وجدان ⬅️ دوباره مشغولشدن ⬅️ چند دقیقه آرامش و همین آرامش کوتاه، دفعه بعد دوباره تو رو سمت کار هل میده. دفعه بعد فقط ۹۰ ثانیه بلند نشو. ببین ذهنت چی میگه: «دارم وقت …
😭1
امروز قبل از اینکه از کسی بپرسی: «به نظرت کارم درست بود؟» یه لحظه مکث کن. شاید دنبال نظر نیستی؛ دنبال کسی هستی که اضطرابت رو موقتاً ساکت کنه. @dralmasimd
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dralmasimd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اضطراب پنهان | دکتر الماسی” (@dralmasimd), 98 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dralmasimd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.