Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,788–7,886 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:39
7,875
+2
14 Sept 2026, 12:56
7,873
+3
10 Sept 2026, 20:37
7,870
+21
5 Sept 2026, 10:59
7,849
+10
1 Sept 2026, 20:56
7,839
-14
29 Aug 2026, 10:48
7,853
+30
26 Aug 2026, 09:23
7,823
-10
23 Aug 2026, 03:17
7,833
+23
19 Aug 2026, 11:47
7,810
+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:38
7,809
+8
13 Aug 2026, 05:06
7,801
+2
10 Aug 2026, 10:40
7,799
-12
6 Aug 2026, 09:31
7,811
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:23
7,811
first reading
Engagement
93 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 93 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
673 reactions across 93 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
268
39.8%
🔥
205
30.5%
🤔
128
19.0%
custom 5363998850841346073
49
7.28%
👏
23
3.42%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 673 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 93 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dprom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 93 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
8.60%
8 of 93 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
8
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
742
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
787
over 85 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFG1vcBj
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2W5zFGTNqus
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2W5zFGachsf
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
2W5zFGs3cnM
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2W5zFHDtq3P
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2W5zFJ8tsqK
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
2W5zFJAax9X
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2W5zFJt5wJZ
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Ремонты самосвалов на КГОКе перевели на цифровое планирование 🚛
Качканарский горно-обогатительный комбинат (Свердловская область) автоматизировал планирование технического обслуживания парка карьерной техники.
Сейчас система охватывает 57 самосвалов БЕЛАЗ и позволяет формировать график ремонтов с точностью до дня, сообщила пресс-служба ЕВРАЗа.
В едином цифровом контуре объединили три информационно-аналитические си…
Эксперты «Технопрома»: редкоземельной отрасли нужно опережающее планирование ◻️
На XIII Международном форуме технологического развития «Технопром-2026» прошла панельная дискуссия «Новые материалы и химия. Редкие и редкоземельные металлы, наукоёмкие технологии и индустрия будущего».
В мероприятии приняли участие представители Минпромторга, НИЦ «Курчатовский институт», «Росатома», Ассоциации РМ и РЗМ, университетов и…
ВМРП прекращает перевалку угля ради улучшения экологии в городе 🌱
Владивостокский морской рыбный порт (ВМРП) прекращает перевалку ископаемого. Акционер предприятия Сергей Дарькин сообщил ТАСС, что решение приняли для повышения качества жизни горожан.
Ежемесячно порт принимал порядка 100 тыс. т угля. ВМРП останется универсальным перегрузочным комплексом и продолжит работу с другими видами сырья.
Решение об отказе о…
«Ургалуголь» установил мировой рекорд по бурению взрывных скважин ◻️
Коллектив компании установил новый мировой рекорд по скоростному бурению взрывных скважин. При плановом показателе 30 тыс. погонных метров фактический объём составил 50 948 — перевыполнение более чем на 69%, пишет rg. ru.
Китайский производитель буровых установок Sunward Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. включил это достижение в свой отраслевой обзо…
«Селигдар» готовит к запуску флотационный цех ЗИФ «Поиск» 🔸
На золотоизвлекательной фабрике производственного комплекса «Поиск» (Алтайский край) подходит к концу строительство цеха флотации, поделилась пресс-служба холдинга.
Сейчас «Селигдар» уже приступил к пусконаладочным работам: гидравлическим испытаниям, комплексному опробованию оборудования, отладкам систем и технологических процессов. Осенью компания планиру…
За шесть месяцев в России открыли 140 месторождений 🔍
В первом полугодии в стране открыли 136 месторождений твёрдых полезных ископаемых и четыре месторождения углеводородного сырья. Большинство из новых объектов — россыпные месторождения золота. Глава Роснедр Олег Казанов сообщил об этом в интервью ТАСС.
По его словам, на баланс уже поставили среднее по запасам газа Пугачевское месторождение в Оренбургской области,…
В Канаде запустят рудник, который даст 20% мирового урана ⛏️
Компания NexGen Energy начала строительство уранового рудника Рук-1 в северной части канадской провинции Саскачеван. Старт производства намечен на 2030 год. Общий объём инвестиций в строительство — $2,2 млрд.
Недропользователь будет разрабатывать месторождение Арроу, которое он открыл в 2014 году. Запасы, по данным на 2026 год, составляют 108 тыс. т закис…
В Омской области хотят возродить добычу титана и циркония 🚜
В Тарском районе Омской области ищут инвестора для строительства горно-обогатительного комплекса на Самсоновском титан-циркониевом месторождении. Предложение опубликовало Агентство развития и инвестиций Омской области, выяснил РБК.
Компанию «Тарский горно-обогатительный комбинат» впервые зарегистрировали в 2005 году. В 2008-м СМИ сообщали, что к строительс…
Две шахты «Колмара» подтопило из-за аномальных паводков
Интенсивные осадки вызвали аномальные паводки в Нерюнгринском районе Якутии. Это привело к частичному затоплению горных выработок на двух шахтах угледобывающей компании «Колмар» — «Восточная Денисовская» (АО «ГОК «Денисовский») и «Инаглинская» (АО «ГОК «Инаглинский»).
В связи с происшествием районная администрация ввела режим чрезвычайной ситуации локального у…
«Полюс» модернизирует комплекс «Надёжный» и обновляет парк техники 🚜
Якутское подразделение компании, «Полюс Алдан», вынесло на общественные обсуждения проект по расширению обогатительного комплекса «Надёжный». Он относится к Куранахской группе месторождений в Якутии.
Недропользователь планирует нарастить мощности участка кучного выщелачивания до 5 млн т руды в год, выяснил «Вестник золотопромышленника».
Сейчас ко…
🚛 «ФосАгро» испытает 42-тонный аккумуляторный самосвал EMSUNTOUR
Кировский филиал АО «Апатит», входящего в группу «ФосАгро», готовится к испытаниям аккумуляторной горной техники на Расвумчоррском руднике в Мурманской области. На предприятие уже доставили китайский подземный самосвал EMSUNTOUR ST42B грузоподъёмностью 42 т, сообщает Telegram-канал Underground Mining Equipment.
Модель выпускает китайская Hubei Shentuo…
Российский уголь в Корее бьёт трёхлетний рекорд 💵
По итогам июля Южная Корея нарастила импорт российского каменного угля, побив прошлый максимум поставок, который пришёлся на середину 2023 года. Известен только объём в денежном выражении — $334,1 млн, пишет «РИА Новости» со ссылкой на данные корейской статслужбы.
За месяц стоимость поставок выросла на 28%, а в годовом выражении — на 14%. За семь месяцев иностранн…
👍2🤔2custom 53639988508413460731
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @dprom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@dprom edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Горная промышленность, геология, обогащение @rosmining_ru · 21,710 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Coala @Coala_russia · 28,661 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
НА-ГОРА. Угольная аналитика @nagora_coalanalytics · 20,936 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
Нержавейка @nerzhavey · 28,488 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Пронедра @pronedraru · 21,678 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Группа НЛМК @nlmk_official · 21,498 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Ростехнадзор @gosnadzorru · 28,160 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Добывающая промышленность онлайн dprom.online” (@dprom), 7,875 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dprom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.