3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 972–1,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 20:27
990
-86
28 Aug 2026, 11:25
1,076
-36
28 Aug 2026, 00:31
1,112
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 990 subscribers
Avg views / post
197
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
20 (8 July 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
1,377
Reactions total
26
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
71 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
38
53.5%
🙏
10
14.1%
❤
8
11.3%
👏
6
8.45%
🔥
4
5.63%
🥰
4
5.63%
🎉
1
1.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👉Whoever interested and left behind can still Join. We will be starting from Tomorrow(Monday). You need to provide me your account details along with specific information about equity leverage and broker. Make sure the broker you chose has BTCUSD and has a tight spread (A reliable Broker). This would require an initial setup upfront fee of $10 to manage the VPS on my own server. Message me @DPNTFX to Start.
👉Due to demand for small account management, We are starting Copy Trading/Account Management with this Strategy in Bitcoin. Scalping strategy with stop Loss and TSL. Rest you can check out here. https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/robofx-77051889-dpntfx/12121163 Those who want to Join can message asap to start from Monday. DM me @DPNTFX Minimum investment $200 to $10000
🔰DPNTFX Services🔰- If anyone is interested in any of our below services, Feel free to reach me✍️ @DPNTFX
👉1. Customized EA & Indicators: If you have a working strategy that you would like to semi-automate or fully automated. You can contact us
👉2. MetaTrader 4 EA/Indicator to MetaTrader 5 EA/Indicator conversion (Most Difficult Task)
👉3. How to Trade Forex with setup & confidence - Personal & Group Training for Begi…
👉Just to make this Clear, This initiative is required Only by Existing Users of Trend Hedging EA who want to use the New Version 2.3 with New Settings.🙏
Dear All, The users of Trend Hedging EA 🤖, I need your observation and feedback on the latest V2.3 Version 🆕.
I'm almost finishing up with the latest settings set files for V2.3 📂. There are more than 50 Settings I created ✍️. Now it's time to multiple test each of them one by one on different brokers, different durations ⏱️.
This is a time-taking and hectic process for me as an individual 🏃♂️. If we work as a Tea…
📶During our Testing in Live Market➡️ 🌈Big Mile-Stone Achieved Today🌈 with ⭐️Trend Hedging Gold EA⭐️-Original Version-Aggressive Set without using any News Filter, Session Filter, Compounding or Equity Protection Filter (New Version 2.3). 🎈100K to +1000K 🎈in Less then 3 Months. Thank you for all your Support🙏
To respect the Multiple Requests & DEMAND, I'm Adding Trend Hedging Gold EA Aggressive Setting logins for you below to observe the trades, till this weekend. But Remember this setting might not suit all traders. You can face much higher floating but interesting to see how it works.
🔰Trend Hedging Gold EA- High Risk Aggressive Risk Set
➡️FP Trading MT5
⛔️Account# 7396377
🌐FPTrading-Demo Server
📶Investor PW: Qy%#Bfs58*…
🙏Based on multiple requests Im sharing the Logins of 2 Accounts based on my last Video. I did not include Trend Hedging Gold High Lot Size risk Settings this time and you can monitor that in myfxbook easily
▶️https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/trend-hedging-gold-dfl-tg/12044853
Please observe how the EA takes trades and understand if your risk appetite allows you to trade like this.
🔰Trend Hedging Gold EA- Low to Me…
👉This is about the new EA file as mentioned with filters.That is a New Version of the EA but NOT A NEW SETTING or SET FILE. As of now, there is no new setting or set file created. I have not Included the previous setting in the New EA File.
This New EA is a protective Layer only.
Open 2 MetaTrader5 Windows, in one of them install the Old EA and load the pre-sets provided earlier on the Other Window Install the New E…
👍2🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dpntfxtradinginfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DPNTFX Trading Info” (@dpntfxtradinginfo), 990 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dpntfxtradinginfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.