Channel
@dplatonova
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
7,439subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001070471996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dplatonova |
| Created | 31 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dplatonova |
Recorded in 2019 as “PLATONOVA” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 7,439 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 7,445 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 7,451 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 7,452 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 7,452 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
690 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 463 | 67.1% | |
| 👍 | 122 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 88 | 12.8% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 2.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 690reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дарья знала, что пути, приносящие усталость и многочисленные поиски в лабиринте времени, более ценны, что успех на них — это не обман мечты, а ценность жизни, она знала, что ни шаг в пропасть, ни усилие, приложенное к успеху, неизмеримы, если это, во-первых, и, во-вторых, необходима та небольшая неопределенность, к которой мы все стремимся, и как немногим из нас удаётся прикоснуться, как говорит Дарья — К СИЛЕ СВЕТА…
❤51🔥8👍3
Любица Митич (Сербия) ОТДАЙТЕ ЭТО РАДУГЕ Влияние и сила людей, преданных истине, сквозь время и пространство. Дарья Дугина, уже отправленная в долгое путешествие по небесным просторам с надеждой, что честность, которую она хранила в своем сердце, будет достаточной, чтобы осветить горизонт по воле Божьей. Возможности, которые в данный момент стоят перед каждым из нас; когда мы выбираем путь, по которому пойдем, когда…
❤32🔥8
Video, posted without a caption
❤15🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
❤10🔥4
Video, posted without a caption
❤11🔥2
File, posted without a caption
👍7❤2
File, posted without a caption
👍7❤3👏1
Video, posted without a caption
👍8❤2
Ритуальное насилие и трансгрессия: между Ж. Батаем и сатанизмом Трансгрессия в понимании Ж. Батая была путем к «суверенности» через сакральное, нуминозное, священный трепет. Однако в «Архипелаге Эпштейна» мы видим вырождение этой идеи в конвейерный «индустриальный садизм». В отличие от кружка «Ацефал» Ж. Батайя, где участники были готовы сами стать жертвами трансгрессии, элита Эпштейна практикует одностороннее насил…
👍25❤6👏2
Философская матрица Постмодерна: от «смерти Бога» к «смерти человека» Парадигма Постмодерна стала для современных элит интеллектуальным лекалом, оправдывающим демонтаж человеческой природы. Если Модерн провозгласил «Смерть Бога», то Постмодерн логически завершил этот путь деконструкцией самого человека. В парадигме Модерна человек еще представляет собой индивидуальность, наделенную Ego», верой в прогресс и рациональ…
👍13❤5👏2
Социология всевластия: теория элит и «железный закон олигархии» Для адекватной дешифровки «дела Эпштейна» требуется, во-первых, строгий социологический анализ закрытых каст управления. Опираясь на концепции В. Парето, Р. Михельса и К. Лэша, мы видим реализацию «железного закона олигархии», где демократические процедуры служат лишь симулякром для маскировки власти узкой группы. В контексте глобального капитала этот з…
👍12🔥6❤3
Мелентьева Н.В. Архипелаг Эпштейна: метафизика расчеловечивания Феномен Эпштейна как сейсмический сдвиг цивилизации История Джеффри Эпштейна — это не просто дериват криминальной хроники или политический скандал, вскрывающий механизмы Глубинного государства. С точки зрения политической метафизики, мы имеем дело с фундаментальным сейсмическим сдвигом — манифестацией глубочайшего онтологического кризиса западной цивил…
👍16🔥4👏2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dplatonova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 669,720 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Daria Dugina |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian journalist and activist |
| X / Twitter | @dariaplatonova_ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PLATONOVA | Z” (@dplatonova), 7,439 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dplatonova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.