Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dozzy | Синдром уставшего персонажа

Channel

Dozzy | Синдром уставшего персонажа

@dozzzzzzzy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003872725143
TypeChannel
Username@dozzzzzzzy
DescriptionТворческий беспорядок в хронологическом порядке ゚.+:。∩(・ω・)∩゚.+:。 Ура ты нашёл щпканал https://t.me/+5VY1GnWWaYYwYTYy
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 7 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dozzzzzzzy

Growth

556 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:0155no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:0255first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
107.3%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held13 (7 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total177
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
2
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5938.3%
custom 52445692707670699672013.0%
custom 5399927935899545504138.44%
custom 5357537970192661526127.79%
custom 5224591118720582835117.14%
custom 5224670047334582880117.14%
custom 540686706545160673195.84%
👀74.55%
custom 540232453194568217953.25%
custom 542280501048222680031.95%
custom 577635147115502440621.30%
custom 544718382896985969410.649%
🍓10.649%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC28 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @raging_waters_of_MorganaPhoto

💎💎💎❗️💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 Иногда достаточно одного вгляда, чтобы выразить все чувства. Слова становятся лишними Shi Qingxuan🌹 He Xuan 💝 Photo🌹 #бифлифы #черновод #шицинсюань #beefleaf

6custom 52445692707670699674custom 54068670654516067312custom 52245911187205828351

31 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кстати на Лянкон свободный вход!!! Приходите 🔝

1

31 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @coldwavemarsPhoto

💖🎀 16 августа с Иллугой будем на сцене ЛянКона! 💖 🖨 ЛянКон #mrscos

7

15 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC139 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @calimerissPhoto

🤩🤩💜💜🌟💜💜💜💜🤩🤩 💜💜💜💜💜🌟💜💜💜💜💜 🤩🤩Дорогие друзья, мы собрались здесь, чтобы поздравить меня с днём рождения! Я вновь стала старше, секси мозгов не прибавилось, ну и на том спасибо 🥰 я не умею писать длинные посты, которые касаются меня, только посты в нашу анстар сетку (кстати, подписываемся, не стесняемся!) ✨✨🪄🪄🪄🪄 Хочу отметить отдельной благодарностью своих друзей, которые постоянно находятся рядом, а также всех подписчик

5

9 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC226 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🪐 다 부숴도 괜찮아 🩻 Till 🩻 Ivan 📸 Соня Блин #alienstage #ivan #till

custom 522467004733458288011custom 522459111872058283510custom 539992793589954550454custom 57763514711550244061

2 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC518 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Наша легенда продолжается! 🤩 Киджа 🤩 Зено 🤩 Шин-А 🤩 Хак 🤩 Йона 🤩 Дже-Ха Фотограф: Shinotomi #рассветйоны #йонаназаре

7custom 52445692707670699676custom 54228050104822268003custom 53575379701926615262

30 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC372 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Ты смотришь на меня снизу вверх, а я хочу смотреть на тебя вечность. 😉 Ши Цинсюань 😕 Хэ Сюань 📷: Takeshi

11custom 53999279358995455048custom 54023245319456821795custom 53575379701926615262custom 52445692707670699671custom 57763514711550244061

22 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC155 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @blueTsvatska0w0Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌸🌸🌸🌸 "Если бы ты знал всё, я верю ты бы попытался спасти меня.." 🤍•Ph/retouch❤️: Доззи 🤍•Location🌸: «Где живут птички?» 🤍•Character: 🤍😅Qifrey - me 🤍•Fandom🌸: Witch hat atelier —————— #АтельеКолдовскихКолпаков / #Кифри БУДУ РАДА РЕПОСТАМ И РЕАКЦИЯМ🌸

4custom 52445692707670699672custom 54068670654516067312

19 Jun 2026, 20:30 UTC116 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😀 Ой, а кто это? В этом канале началась эра геншина 🙂

👀7custom 53575379701926615263custom 540686706545160673132🍓1

15 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC134 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @coldwavemarsPhoto

🌸🌸🌸🌸 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🌸 ph, rt: @dozzzzzzzy he said, «come wander with me, love come wander with me...» #mrscos

custom 52445692707670699675custom 53575379701926615263custom 540686706545160673121

15 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC123 viewsread 10 August 2026

Стабильно раз в год беру в руки камеру и что то снимаю даже..

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dozzzzzzzy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 461,523 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dozzy | Синдром уставшего персонажа” (@dozzzzzzzy), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dozzzzzzzy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.