斗争前线是在宣布解散后解散群聊的,此人在斗争前线解散群聊之后将新频道链接设为斗争前线旧群链接(这就是之前他冒充红旗群管理员的方法),斗争前线已解散,不会有将群聊和频道(斗争前线频道仍然正常,这个恶俗分子只是把斗争前线的旧群聊链接用来创建频道)交接给恶俗分子的可能,这还是在欺负死人不会说话(就像之前他造谣中毛共那样)。
Channel
1966
@douzhengqianxian1966
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
-380 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003921135908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @douzhengqianxian1966 |
| Created | 12 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/douzhengqianxian1966 |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2026, 06:15 | 5 | +3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 2 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:23 | 13 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 13 | -392 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 405 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 411 | +18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 393 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 385 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 146.7%
- avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7.3
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (12 September 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 22 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 01:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
应(前)斗争前线成员(用“前”字是因为斗争前线已解散)要求代发: 我们斗争前线的管理员们,不得不从我们的工作与生活中探出头来进行一番简短的驳斥: 我们的解散和任何用我们的名义进行网络恐怖主义宣传的组织没有任何关系,是我们直接被中修打击的结果。不要信任这些组织,不要倾听他们的所谓屈服与投降论。正如我们在解散声明中直接陈述的一样,斗争前线的解散只代表斗争前线本身。 另外,因为工革报哪怕在我们长期劝谏下依旧坚持一条有害于革命的泛左翼团结路线,我们很早就在内部与其划清了明确的界限。 斗争前线已经解散,我们后续也不会继续利用一个已死的名号进行活动,任何在这个声明后这样做的组织和个人都是仿冒。
组织声明代发 斗争前线在近期发生变故,频道和群聊不再受控,故应斗争前线要求,在这里代发其解散声明 斗争前线解散声明 各位同志: 8月2日,我们小组遭到了中修的打击。由于我们此前在部分组织和决策问题上的左倾冒进,中修最终锁定了我们的组织。此后,我们的匿名管理员相继失联,至今已经接近一个月,现有群组已经无法继续进行有效管理,已有频道也无法正常更新。与此同时,考虑到部分同志已经因为中修方面掌握的信息受到警方审查,我们也无法确认现有部分账号是否仍然由本人掌握。在这种情况下,继续维持原有组织和传播渠道,已经存在无法忽视的风险。 经过严肃讨论和投票,目前仍能够取得联系的管理员和编辑决定,自即日起,《斗争前线》写作组暂停活动,现有群组和频道同时废弃;我们也将解散现有的相关组织架构,停止相应的组织活动。 《斗争前线》自2025年7月创立至今,恰好走过了一年一个月的时间。在这一年中,我们很高兴能够与各位同志共同前进,也很高兴能够在反对反革…
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @douzhengqianxian1966. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1966” (@douzhengqianxian1966), 5 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/douzhengqianxian1966.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.