Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

豆瓣电影

@douban12345

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

716subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002462212866
TypeChannel
Username@douban12345
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/douban12345

Growth

711716713.56 August 2026 — 713 subscribers6 August 2026 — 713 subscribers7 August 2026 — 711 subscribers15 August 2026 — 716 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 710–717 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 07:15716+5
7 Aug 2026, 15:37711-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:03713no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:52713first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.6%
avg views ÷ 716 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,381
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC17 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❤️欢迎来到 TGRSS —— Telegram 上最智能、最全能的 RSS 自动内容矩阵! 在这里,你不需要手动刷新网页、不需要下载 App、不需要错过任何热点。 TGRSS 通过实时 RSS 订阅 + 自动化推送,为你打造了一个“内容永不缺席”的私人信息流: 实时全球新闻:科技、财经、国际大事,一秒不落 成人专区(18+):精选故事、幽默、亲密建议与行业动态(纯链接推送,安全隐私优先) [❤️‍🔥赞助商]TGFOX矩阵机器人 👩🏻‍⚕️广告投放: @TGRSS123 🚀支持200+频道同时投放,所有频道每天推送一次

6 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC35 viewsread 6 August 2026

八仙——资本精装修下的一坨 最近,网络各平台上八仙的宣传,铺天盖地的闯入了我的视线,骂的不少,但夸的更多... 豆瓣 • Jul 18, 2026

6 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC45 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥TeleTop 频道推荐 📢TG色情网站导航 📢窮奢極欲 📢好好J💋HoHoJ.tv 📢HoHoJ 打J好幫手 | 免費線上AV... 📢pornhub.com最佳色情网站 📢V2EX官方中文频道 📢网络高分电影 📢PornDude 最佳性爱频道 📢时光不能倒流|怀旧|青春|活力 📢天天壁纸 💎广告推荐 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升V... 📢✅金边娱乐城✅全网上押800万u盘总聚集... 📢🔥最强平台强势来袭,掀起智能合约新风暴... 🔍互推公示 🪧流量互推说明

4 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC103 viewsread 6 August 2026

年会不能停,但这个系列可以停了 实在难以想象,和第一部同样的导演、同样的编剧、同一个演员和制作班底,呈现出来... 豆瓣 • Aug 1, 2026

3 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC144 viewsread 6 August 2026

是广告就别收票钱 是演讲就去讲脱口秀 总体评价:不如第一部。 第一部还有条完整的故事线,笑点长在讽刺点上。 第二部东拼... 豆瓣 • Aug 1, 2026

3 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC155 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道

3 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC158 viewsread 6 August 2026

如果这就是中国的职场电影,那电影院活该倒闭 猝不及防就遇到了过去两三年里在影院看过的最烂电影。属于自己的时间越来越少,所... 豆瓣 • Aug 1, 2026

3 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC154 viewsread 6 August 2026

宗教、欲望与无法逃离的故乡 Adrian Chiarella的《Leviticus》是一部很难被简单归类的电影。它表面上是一部超自... 豆瓣 • Jan 23, 2026

2 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC174 viewsread 6 August 2026

炫技至上的空洞闹剧,诺兰不配触碰荷马的《奥德赛》,堆砌实景与胶片镜头,终究救不了彻底干瘪的故事内核 期待已久,看的onlyflix版。克里斯托弗・诺兰把三千年荷马史诗拍成了一场空洞的 ... 豆瓣 • Jul 16, 2026

2 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC220 viewsread 6 August 2026

年会2选择张若昀绝对是最正确的选择 一个IP若想继续成功。绝不应该只复刻成功的前作,而是纳入新鲜血液,不断深化主题... 豆瓣 • Aug 1, 2026

2 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC233 viewsread 6 August 2026

干活儿干得好的人,只会得到更多的活儿 先说个结论: 《年会2》直接说了个大实话—— 任何人类组织的运转基本原理,就是高... 豆瓣 • Aug 1, 2026

1 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC231 viewsread 6 August 2026

真消费真说话 简直是一坨来的 剧情概况:电影开头是汪美丽回忆她和高凡的小时候 然后回忆完了汪就和一个男的啃上... 豆瓣 • Jul 17, 2026

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @douban12345. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 215,651 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“豆瓣电影” (@douban12345), 716 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/douban12345.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.