Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DOTS.tech

Channel

DOTS.tech

@dotscompany

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

713subscribers

-214 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810626185
TypeChannel
Username@dotscompany
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dotscompany

Growth

7139278207 August 2026 — 927 subscribers8 August 2026 — 927 subscribers8 August 2026 — 922 subscribers16 August 2026 — 901 subscribers23 August 2026 — 713 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net -214. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 681–959 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 05:12713-188
16 Aug 2026, 07:15901-21
8 Aug 2026, 15:10922-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:51927no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:27927first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.9%
avg views ÷ 713 subscribers
Avg views / post
855
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held18 (26 March 202631 July 2026)
Views total855
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC855 viewsread 8 August 2026

All of our products will receive important updates in the coming days. We have refined certain features and fixed minor bugs that some users experienced. We strongly recommend that you do not use older versions of our systems. Especially versions older than 4.6. Each update includes critical changes to how the robot operates, and sometimes updates are released because MetaTrader has released a new version of its pl

24 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC954 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Remember the lucky guy who won DOTS ONE? We promised to keep track of his progress. Today we found out that David is now the owner of two FTMO accounts, one with 10k and one with 100k. We asked him to leave a review, and he was happy to do so. We’ll continue to follow @dddbooss — it’ll be interesting to see how far he can go. Maybe in a year, we’ll see his maximum allocation in FTMO. By the way, David is our only c

1 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC805 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

DOTS ONE GFT SPECIAL has been officially launched. We have thoroughly tested the system, received our first payout, and are ready to work with clients. For $1,949, you’ll receive the original DOTS ONE, which will include the GFT SPECIAL mode. All future updates are included. Customer Service: @leomainhero With great respect and love, DOTS Tech.

30 Jun 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://trader.ftmo.com/metrix/511271888/share/019f169e-974d-728d-afb1-2dac5476b096?lang=en We’re always thrilled when people share detailed information (metrics, statistics) about how DOTS ONE is performing. As you know, we collect real-time statistics via API directly from your bots. But it’s even more satisfying to see your wins in your FTMO dashboard! 👀 The first stage of the FTMO challenge, completed in less t

25 Jun 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The new version of Goat Funded’s instant account is already in the testing phase! We’ve noticed that Goat Funded is the second most popular prop trading firm among our clients. So we’ve decided to create a special version of DOTS ONE that will include the GOAT FUNDED INSTANT feature. As many of you know, with Goat Funded, you can purchase a “ready-made” account without having to complete a challenge (ranging from 5

24 Jun 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

June is coming to an end, with 11 challenges completed. Not a bad result for a low-volatility summer month. Win rate for the month: 80% Recovery factor: 11.71 Profitability: 12.71 The latest DOTS ONE update significantly reduced the number of trades. However, it increased win rates and profitability. We're committed to making our product stronger with each update.

15 Jun 2026, 19:25 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We’re halfway through June. We’re ready to hit the ground running. DOTS ONE is delivering excellent results. All our improvements and new indicators are doing a fantastic job of filtering out market noise. We’ll continue to develop our technologies and provide our clients with high-quality code. ⚡️To celebrate, we’ll be giving away a 25k SWING account on FTMO to 5 randomly selected customers through the end of June!

10 Jun 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

It's a hot day. Everyone at the FTMO office is a little tense. Two challenges were completed today. DOTS ONE generated 5.5% profit in one day. Days like these are what we work for.

8 Jun 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Dots Live 2.1 releases on June 14. This is a system we originally developed for ourselves and our accounts at a prop trading firm, but we recently decided to make it available exclusively to our clients. In the new version, you’ll see all bugs fixed, a new indicator for more accurate entries, and two new modes: standard and intensive. We’ve put in a lot of work and added everything we didn’t have time to include in

1 Jun 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

There's a new review on the site! 1 year of owning DOTS ONE. We completely agree with the author —sometimes things don't go exactly as we'd like, but we always fix any issues. We care about each of our customers, their performance metrics, their wins and losses — that's our job.

22 May 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 8 August 2026

DOTS is recruiting beta testers. Anyone who purchases any Dots product from today until June 1st will receive a FREE new robot, the DOTS 313 (it will be priced at $945 in the future). The Dots 313 is the pinnacle of algorithmic engineering, and 10 customers who purchase any product during this period will receive it free for testing. Contact customer service to become part of Dots ❤️

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dotscompany. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,174,001 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DOTS.tech” (@dotscompany), 713 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dotscompany.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.