Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Doska_Pocheta_Dagestan

Channel

Doska_Pocheta_Dagestan

@doska_pocheta_dagestan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

809subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001538446124
TypeChannel
Username@doska_pocheta_dagestan
Created19 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doska_pocheta_dagestan

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8078118097 August 2026 — 808 subscribers8 August 2026 — 808 subscribers14 August 2026 — 809 subscribers22 August 2026 — 808 subscribers28 August 2026 — 811 subscribers4 September 2026 — 807 subscribers13 September 2026 — 809 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 806–812 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 00:41809+2
4 Sept 2026, 17:20807-4
28 Aug 2026, 01:34811+3
22 Aug 2026, 00:28808-1
14 Aug 2026, 22:57809+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:34808no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:49808first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
4m 06s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

158 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12679.7%
❤1610.1%
🔥85.06%
🤔53.16%
😁21.27%
🤬10.633%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2024 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2026, 16:05 UTC932 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Учителя обратились с открытом письмом, где они возмущаются задержкам их зарплат: Педагоги не должны работать бесплатно! Мы, учителя Дагогнинских школ ,обращаемся к общественности и руководству города. Сегодня мы оказались в ситуации, когда наш труд остается без оплаты. Мы продолжаем выходить на уроки, проверять тетради и готовить детей к экзаменам, но наши семьи остались без средств к существованию. Задержка зарпла…

👍9🔥5❤1

Signed Ramis Agabekov

15 Nov 2025, 18:19 UTC≈1,440 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Семью нашего земляка, погибшего в зоне СВО, оставили без отопления после аварии. Батареи и трубы в их квартире попросту отрезали. В отчаянии родные обратились за поддержкой к главе города Дагестанские Огни Замиру Гаджимурадову, рассчитывая, что боевой товарищ не оставит в беде. Ведь именно о поддержке семей участников СВО и своих боевых товарищей мэр так любит рассуждать в соцсетях. Увы, реальность оказалась горькой…

🤔5👍3❤1

Signed Ramis Agabekov

26 Oct 2025, 17:08 UTC≈1,360 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍10❤1

Signed Ramis Agabekov

23 Aug 2025, 11:03 UTC≈1,960 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Срочно к вниманию всех жителей Дагестанских Огней и республики!** 🔥 Город Дагестанские Огни, который мог бы стать жемчужиной Дагестана, превращается в зону экологического и социального бедствия. И виной этому — катастрофическая некомпетентность и безразличие мэра и городской администрации! ## 🗑️ Мусорный апокалипсис: власть бездействует! Город буквально тонет в отходах. Контейнерные площадки переполнены, мусор неде…

👍24❤8

Signed Ramis Agabekov

23 Aug 2025, 11:03 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Ramis Agabekov

21 Aug 2025, 17:36 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @antipod_rd

В Каспийске идет кампания по комплексному улучшению санитарного состояния города. демонстрация проявлений должностной и управленческой некомпетентности главы Бориса Гонцова. Традиция выезжать на горбу предпринимателей и на их кошельках в решении горячих социальных задач дагестанских муниципалитетов(на что в муниципальных бюджетах предусматриваются успешно распиливаемые мэрами потом денежные средства соответствующих …

❤2

Signed Ramis Agabekov

10 Aug 2025, 06:59 UTC976 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍3😁2

Signed Ramis Agabekov

8 Aug 2025, 12:15 UTC≈1,070 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍18

Signed Ramis Agabekov

29 Jul 2025, 12:32 UTC≈1,310 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Большое «уважение» проявили нашим старикам и СВОшникам, руководство города, разместив мусор прямо возле домов, в нарушении всех норм.

👍17❤3

Signed Ramis Agabekov

20 Jul 2025, 14:29 UTC≈1,350 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В Дагестанских Огнях, снова проблема с водой, люди на грани!

👍8

Signed Ramis Agabekov

18 Jul 2025, 15:41 UTC≈1,170 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Пенсию вернут!!! Пропавшие деньги пенсионеров, обещали вернуть до вторника будущей недели.

👍6

Signed Ramis Agabekov

18 Jul 2025, 06:01 UTC≈1,120 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В Дагестанских Огнях, начальник почты, украл деньги пенсионеров

👍7

Signed Ramis Agabekov

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doska_pocheta_dagestan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Doska_Pocheta_Dagestan” (@doska_pocheta_dagestan), 809 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doska_pocheta_dagestan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.