Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dorothy Dora Box

@dorothy_dora

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398699501
TypeChannel
Username@dorothy_dora
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dorothy_dora

Growth

757675.56 August 2026 — 75 subscribers9 August 2026 — 75 subscribers13 August 2026 — 76 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:4876+1
9 Aug 2026, 21:1575no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:3975first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.9%
avg views ÷ 76 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
25.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held14 (22 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total44
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53459087062886079314828.9%
custom 53461613319699893683420.5%
custom 53435675711551663953319.9%
custom 51950384838439194841911.4%
custom 53418120376326633441911.4%
custom 544485874412920280984.82%
custom 545621850313039249031.81%
custom 534629888259261335321.20%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC44 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

То, что рисовала в декабре. Ничего не заняла, даже стыдно, что на что-то надеялась. Почитать работу можно тут: https://smacmag.net/v/sma24/love-andamp-letter-by-dorothydora/

custom 53435675711551663956custom 53462988825926133532custom 54562185031303924902custom 54448587441292028091

5 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC86 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А! Кстати да, насчет той картинки. Вот, а то не знаю, когда удастся закончить, так что пусть полежит пока так 🌺

custom 51950384838439194848custom 53459087062886079314custom 53435675711551663952

5 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC78 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Прошлую картинку почти закончила, поделюсь ею позже, а пока нашла новый конкурс манги, уже всё продумала, теперь надо срочно рисовать и оч много, но если всё получится, выйдет разъеб, отвечаю 🚶‍♀️ Вот взялась за раскадровку, в кадр входит БОГИНЯ 😍 это еще даже не скетч, а она уже такая классная, постараюсь держать уровень

custom 53461613319699893688custom 53459087062886079314custom 53418120376326633441

15 Jun 2026, 19:52 UTC122 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нарисовала глаз, дорисовала к нему лицо, и теперь это тот самый мем с лошадью БУКВАЛЬНО 🤣🤣🤣

custom 51950384838439194849custom 53459087062886079312

28 May 2026, 20:30 UTC149 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В этот раз увлеклась лив2д, так что это будет анимация!! 🥹 Ну... я надеюсь

custom 53461613319699893687custom 53459087062886079312

19 May 2026, 08:46 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Искусство Простите, я не могу перестать смеяться

custom 53418120376326633447

14 May 2026, 20:03 UTC165 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, на днях тренила композицию, мне сделали немного правок, но в принципе, они не такие и критичные, так что загружу сюда без них, и так очень нравится, что получилось 🥰

custom 53459087062886079315custom 53435675711551663953custom 53461613319699893682custom 54448587441292028091

14 May 2026, 18:55 UTC134 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Моя семья (апельсиновый!) Решила подумать о том, как отношусь к персонажам, любовь к которым прошла проверку временем, получилась очень странная картина :D пожалуйста, не показывайте это моим врачам Зато получилась такая подборочка для знакомства со мной поближе 🌚 Узнали, согласны?

custom 53418120376326633447custom 53459087062886079312custom 54562185031303924901

12 May 2026, 15:59 UTC112 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

И поделюсь еще радостью, пришел официальный ненд Рафаэля, усадила голову на бжд тело, получилось прям хорошоооо 🥰🥰🥰

custom 53461613319699893686custom 53435675711551663954custom 51950384838439194842

11 May 2026, 12:38 UTC141 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Спойлеры, спойлеры! Моя новая персонажка, дизайн авторства Юши, сделаю потом для нее отдельный пост, потому что полюбилась Пошла делать аниматик на основе клипа КАнгел, это интро 🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️

custom 53459087062886079317custom 53435675711551663954custom 53461613319699893683

8 May 2026, 19:37 UTC139 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданно получилось горячее, чем я планировала 😍 Несколько фактов, с которыми связан арт: - Нало сказала, что Алео - "он". Я даже уточнила! У меня сломался мир, но появилась идея для рисунка - У него реально нет рубашки в оригинале!! Что за разврат в уютной игре, одобряю Пруф и оригинальный образ скину в комменты, кому интересно Это будет полноценка, но закончу позже ❤️

custom 53461613319699893688custom 53459087062886079317custom 53418120376326633444

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dorothy_dora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 687,621 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dorothy Dora Box” (@dorothy_dora), 76 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dorothy_dora.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.