Channel
@dorotheaart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
515subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001524622381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dorotheaart |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dorotheaart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 515 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 515 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (30 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,087 |
| Reactions total | 112 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
245 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 126 | 51.4% | |
| 🔥 | 83 | 33.9% | |
| custom 5230993458965013124 | 18 | 7.35% | |
| 💅 | 13 | 5.31% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.816% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.408% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.408% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.408% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dorotheaart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Арнаут Капдекан, защитник церкви, ветеран паломнический войн и рыцарь лев. Прибыл ли он в город Баланторино, чтобы составить конкуренцию и перебить наших учителей? Или поможет вызволить соратников из каменной неволи? Тенетень, НПС, который появился только сегодня, традишка, #Ходящие_по_Сикарису
❤14🔥7🤔1custom 52309934589650131241
Итак, мой первый опыт сбора чёток по заказу! Это было очень интересно! Вязать узлы между бусинами — дело не самое простое, но весьма залипательное! Но самое интересное — это подбирать фурнитуру к прописанному концепту. Я хотела сделать кисточку сама, но оказалось, это немного сложнее, че м я думала, поэтому я купила готовую🙂 Бусины на чётках — это Цитрин, Жёлтый Агат и Гелиотроп. Надеюсь, эти чётки понравятся, чел…
🔥13custom 52309934589650131242❤1
Чуть ли не забыла показать! В общем, пока одна сессия была пропущена, добавлю пост в #Ходящие_по_Сикарису другим способом. Так как у мужа был юбилей, а эта его кампания выходит очень яркой по своему сеттингу, то я решила подарить ему артефакт: внутриигровые чётки одной из религий. По итогу придумался розарий под Западный Митраизм, тем более, что он во многом (хоть и далеко не во всём) повторяет традиции западнохрист…
❤8custom 52309934589650131245🌚2
Все художники флудят, так что я тоже пофлужу Каких вы знаете красивых, жутких, необычных, привлекающих внимание рыб? Особенно интересует не окраска, а форм-фактор, и хочется не гуглить топ-N, а узнать, что поражает лично вас Бонус: рыбки-родственницы той самой Дори разных подвидов, которые во время рисования выбесили меня тем, какие же они все одинаковые
❤7💅4🔥3
Предскриптум, так сказать: за все эти заморочки с опросами и папками держите эскиз того, что вы увидите ближе к концу лета. Кто сможет назвать, из каких миссий Space Marine 2 эти безумно красивые в оригинале панорамы, тот молодец🌚 Вижу ваши голоса и не буду сносить, получается. Всё-таки 30 с гаком пользователей — это вполне приличное микрокоммьюнити) А пока дочищайте 5 папку, обновив подписку на нее, чтобы не упусти…
❤11
Нужны ли вам папки с НРИ-каналами?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💅1
Друзья, в Телеграме появились сообщества: гораздо более компактные, добровольные, но не настолько масштабные, как папки, сборники каналов. Стоит ли мне продолжать держать дальше папки и сделать шестую, когда последняя закончится? Пользуетесь ли вы ими? Доподписываетесь ли на тех, кто добавляется в папки со временем? В общем, хочется узнать, насколько вам актуально вот это вот всё или вы только на мои рисунки хотите…
💅3
Надеюсь, вы про меня не забыли) Я долго отсутствовала, но продолжаю рисовать: просто в основном это традишка (!) в акварели (!!!) по Space Marine 2 (?) и моим пленерным похождения, которая пока лежит в закромах у бустеров, потому что я пока не добралась до сканера. Ну и немного диджа, но это либо процессы, либо спойлеры к Тенетьме, которые я не показываю, пока не придет время их появления в игре. А вам пока хочу пок…
🔥18❤6custom 52309934589650131245
Как вы могли понять по гадательному посту, я-таки дорисовала и дооформила все свои карты для Таро по Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay. Главным референсом стала классическая колода Райдера-Уэйта. Каждый персонаж — герой той или иной кампании, в которой я участвовала, и пока этот проект я считаю законченным. Чуть больше года назад я нарисовала и опубликовала первую карту со своей Томазиной, полуросликом-сторожем. С тех пор …
❤32🔥12🥰1
Совсем скоро я покажу вам еще картинок, однако не могу не поделиться, что начался новый джем бумажных миниатюр! Я не участвовала в прошлых (хотя очень хотелось), но подумываю попробовать нарисовать что-то для этого. Тем более, что были мысли сделать что-то для ЗиПа... Делитесь под постом, если вы тоже поучаствуете — вместе веселее)
❤12
Теперь это гадательные камушки имени Урзы (конечно, вы ее наверняка ещё помните!) и моей новой сахрийки, Райханы. Получается, #Ходящие_по_Сикарису
❤7🔥2custom 52309934589650131242
🧡 В пасмурный день принесли вам песчаные и солнечные D20, которые сделали специально для художник Анна Музыка || Dorothea. Внутри двадцаток - стеклянные сферы с настоящим песком. Небольшой кусочек пустыни прямо в руках. Одна двадцатка более темная и дымчатая, вторая - солнечная и с различными около арабскими изображениями. Спасибо огромное Ане за классный заказ и идею, а еще мы что-то скоро совместное и классное в…
❤10🔥7💅5custom 52309934589650131241
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dorotheaart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нужны ли вам папки с НРИ-каналами?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 210,505 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доротея || рисунки и щитпост” (@dorotheaart), 515 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dorotheaart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.