Posted without readable text
custom 53169260092771688316

Channel
@doribalor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001653053164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doribalor |
| Description | Это душевность |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doribalor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 39 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 39 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
168 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5262477699548457626 | 35 | 20.8% | |
| custom 5361670145343236737 | 28 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5362091863887064834 | 18 | 10.7% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 10.7% | |
| 🍓 | 14 | 8.33% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 6.55% | |
| custom 5361683734619761146 | 8 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5316926009277168831 | 6 | 3.57% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 2.98% | |
| custom 5359284999679910348 | 1 | 0.595% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2025 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doribalor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2025 to 18 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 53169260092771688316
🔗🔗 𝒥𝒶𝓃ℯ 𝒟ℴℯ 🔗 настроение такое, немножко крысиное вообще хочется отснять Джейн, а то это моя единственная фотка с патички но из идей у меня только что запросто уйдет на OnlyFans🔗
❤7custom 53620918638870648344custom 53616701453432367372custom 52624776995484576261
но меня блять не отпускает некая мысль особенно в куске сюжетки грейс… ебать а меня давно в игру засунули ?))))))))
😱8🤯5❤3
мой первый резик в жизни так волнительно леон секси
❤4custom 53592849996799103481custom 53616701453432367371
если в ночь с 31-го на 1-е перевести мне на карту 5000₽, то весь год вам будет сопутствовать удача. если не успеете 31-го — не беда, 1-го января тоже можно, но уже 10000₽. не игнорируйте это сообщение, оно реально работает 🙏
❤2
больше не поиграю в геншин
😱10
довели. пошла качать геншин
custom 52624776995484576264custom 53620918638870648343custom 53616701453432367372
тоже наделала я этих фигурок… а если такие сделать ирл я стану миллионершей
🍓7custom 53620918638870648346custom 53616837346197611464
я жертва маркетинга
🍓6custom 53616701453432367375custom 52624776995484576264
внимание вопрос на интуицию: сколько фигурок pop mart нужно купить, чтобы тебя начали узнавать сотрудники и рассказывать другим что ты та самая «легенда» спойлер: сейчас их чуть за 60. но возможно пополнение)))
custom 52624776995484576266custom 53616837346197611464custom 53616701453432367371
впервые в косплее за тысячу лет 💗 /перебираюсь на сторону горячих женщин/
custom 526247769954845762611custom 53620918638870648345custom 53616701453432367374🍓1
Они секси женщины 💅 #cosmur
💘10custom 53616701453432367375custom 52624776995484576262
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @doribalor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,129,586 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дори в омуте” (@doribalor), 39 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doribalor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.