Channel
@doomcult3d
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
132subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003382644864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doomcult3d |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 23 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doomcult3d |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 132 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 133 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 135 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 135 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
297 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 85 | 28.6% | |
| 🥰 | 50 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5195103269130640172 | 33 | 11.1% | |
| 🍾 | 33 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5197595303645057410 | 27 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5425111515294354563 | 27 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5465262274031659421 | 19 | 6.40% | |
| custom 5445284521417131735 | 11 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5224279733591626747 | 6 | 2.02% | |
| custom 5424972835095329742 | 4 | 1.35% | |
| custom 5435891415055878798 | 2 | 0.673% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот так выглядит мой первый обвес на сумку с моим же летним луком 🤩 Первые опыты по покрасу миниатюр (мне нравится даже больше чем покрас больших фигур). Скоро будет видео на эту тему и инстаграм нашей мастерской ⚡
custom 51951032691306401728🔥5custom 51975953036450574103custom 52242797335916267473
Кажется, я случайно изобрела идеальный антистресс для взрослых🤔 Сегодня устроила тест-драйв: вручила подруге её мини-копию в стиле Bratz, но в «чистом» виде. Задача раскрасить фигурку самостоятельно. Теперь это не просто аксессуар, а личный арт-проект. А вы бы хотели примерить на себя роль художника? Как вам идея: получить подвес со своей мини-версией и раскрасить его своими руками?🤩
🔥11🍾6🥰4
Делаю маленькие обвесы на сумку в стиле Bratz , скоро покажу :> Так непривычно красить что-то на столько миниатюрное 🤩
🔥7custom 54652622740316594215custom 54249728350953297423
🤩Новый , очень необычный и масштабный заказ🤩 🤩Мы взялись за него из интереса , сделать что-то на столько детализированное и изящное , хрупкое и яркое. Теперь мы разрабатываем прочный бокс для транспортировки и готовимся к отправке , чтобы все дошло в целостности и сохранности 🤩
🔥12custom 54652622740316594215custom 54452845214171317354custom 51951032691306401722🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9🥰7custom 54452845214171317354
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰8custom 51975953036450574106custom 54251115152943545635custom 51951032691306401724
Проект "Король мух" выходит на финишную прямую. Эта работа — мой оммаж творчеству Димы Хаски и его переплетению с образом Вельзевула. Идея родилась спонтанно, как это часто бывает. На консультации у своего тату-мастера мы разговорились о музыке: обсуждали Shortparis, грандиозный концерт Хаски в Москве и ту невероятную энергетику, которую он несет. Я верю в то, что искусство должно быть адресным. Мне захотелось трансф…
🔥13custom 51951032691306401724custom 54251115152943545632custom 54452845214171317351
Знаете, друзья, я вот теряюсь иногда в догадках, чем же с вами поделиться и как. Решила устроить голосовалку , интересно Ваше мнение. Поделитесь, пожалуйста ❤
🔥5custom 51975953036450574104custom 54452845214171317352
Что бы вы хотели чаще видеть в группе? 🖱️
The shares total 231%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 51975953036450574105custom 52242797335916267473custom 54358914150558787982
Очень приятно увидеть такую распаковку и получить высокую оценку нашей работы ☺️ И как же было приятно увидеться вживую 🥰
🍾8🔥4custom 51975953036450574101
Смотрим распаковку!!! Это конечно полный восторг. Спасибо ребята! Вы невероятные молодцы. Я желаю, чтобы вы стрельнули и все у вас получилось. Кстати, мы лично познакомились с создательницей студии, и я не тонко намекнула, что у меня есть настолка, к которой я хочу фигурки🖤
🍾9custom 54251115152943545636🥰5
Кстати о большой любви к тульским творческим ребятам. Я просто обожаю художницу из Тулы https://t.me/okolo_pelikana . Как мы переехали в Тулу , увидели её на маркете , купили открытки и не можем перестать залипать на этот ✨СТИЛЬ✨. Я не могла не сделать ей ту самую узнаваемую голову - аватара. Хорошо будет смотреться как подвеска на сумку☺️⚡
🥰10custom 54251115152943545634custom 51951032691306401722
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @doomcult3d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что бы вы хотели чаще видеть в группе? 🖱️
The shares total 231%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 15 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
““ДумКульт” студия 3Д печати” (@doomcult3d), 132 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doomcult3d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.