1
Signed 西皮
Channel
@dongshenrj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
297subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004300863938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dongshenrj |
| Created | 6 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dongshenrj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 297 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 308 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 310 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 310 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (6 August 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,609 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
15 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 93.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1
Signed 西皮
Posted without readable text
Signed 优优
@xipigh_bot 机器人充值联系 @yanyan7768
Signed 西皮
给你们搞点啥玩呢🤔
👍1
Signed 优优
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍1
Signed 优优
@unsaax 此人以后就是西皮的助理 全国头机器人我已经给他授权了 有bug或者需要人民币充值联系他 这个频道以后不常看也不常运营 全由我的助理来运营
👍1
Signed 西皮
在下面评论发二要素 送头
👍2
Signed 西皮
送点头 在下面评论发
👍2
Signed 西皮
送头 继续发点
👍3
发点二要素 送全国头 明天开机就送
👍1
发机器人的id 给你们升最高等级
👍2❤1
#全国头机器人通知 @xipigh_bot 全自动化自助出单机器人 ⬇️全国头机器人功能介绍⬇️ 全国单大头照默认扣除💵1积分 全国假地址照默认扣除💵1积分 全国单户籍地默认扣除💵2积分 可选择okpay/人民币充值 1u=1积分🔮 okpay可以任意金额充值 秒到账🔮 ‼️注意:⚠️机器人任何功能都是秒响应 秒出结果✔️ 如果你想长期做假地址 可以找客服调价格 绝对让你稳盈利🟢没有u充值积分的可以私信客服人民币充值⚠️ 全国头机器人客服: @yanyan7768 @unsaax 全国头机器人频道: https://t.me/dongshenrj
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dongshenrj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“通知频道” (@dongshenrj), 297 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dongshenrj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.