6 measurements spanning 30 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 17:36
135
+7
30 Aug 2026, 23:53
128
+2
23 Aug 2026, 09:57
126
+3
16 Aug 2026, 21:55
123
+2
10 Aug 2026, 04:32
121
no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:17
121
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
54 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5298637905386839099
26
48.1%
custom 5300750677109152296
14
25.9%
custom 5298756652642638833
11
20.4%
custom 5301252264864822312
3
5.56%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dom_pravda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🥳Правильный ответ — «Известия».
Именно это издание не выпускалось в комбинате «Правда».
Зато здесь печатались многие самые известные газеты и журналы страны: «Комсомольская правда», «Огонёк», «Крокодил», «Советская Россия», «Сельская жизнь» и другие издания.
🦙«Известия» же выпускались в собственном издательском комплексе.
Спасибо всем, кто принял участие! Многие оказались правы 🔥
+7 495 419 95 65 | сайт | AI bot
Продолжаем нашу викторину! 😅😄😆
Сегодня вопрос для тех, кто внимательно следит за историей «Дома Правды».
Какая газета (или журнал) НЕ выпускалась в комбинате «Правда»?
Голосуйте в опросе. Посмотрим, сколько среди наших подписчиков настоящих знатоков истории «Правды».
#викторина_Правда
#ИнвестиционнаяЦенность
Во что инвестируют предприниматели, когда деньги перестают быть главной целью?
Когда базовые финансовые цели уже достигнуты, меняется и сам подход к инвестициям.
На первый план выходит не только доходность, но и ценность актива. Поэтому многие предприниматели начинают инвестировать в то, что невозможно воспроизвести заново.
Таких объектов с каждым годом становится меньше, а их ценность — т…
«Дом Правды» — в новом спецвыпуске «Россия 24»
На канале «Россия 24» вышел специальный выпуск «Дом с именем», посвящённый бывшему комбинату газеты «Правда» — зданию с богатой историей и новым будущим.
Журналист знакомит зрителей с новой историей здания, а Олег Дедков, управляющий партнер девелопера «Метрополис» и соавтор книги «Дом Правды. На первой полосе архитектуры», показывает его изнутри и рассказывает, каким …
🥳Правильный ответ — Пантелеймон Голосов
Когда в конце 1920-х годов объявили конкурс на проект нового комбината газеты «Правда», победу одержал архитектор Пантелеймон Голосов.
С 1930 года Голосов практически полностью посвятил себя работе над комбинатом, совершенствуя первоначальную концепцию. Он сохранил функциональную основу конструктивизма, но сделал архитектуру более выразительной, дополнив ее благородными матер…
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Продолжаем нашу викторину!
Первый вопрос оказался не таким простым, как кажется. Посмотрим, как вы справитесь со следующим.
Угадаете, кто создал один из главных архитектурных символов советского конструктивизма? ➡️
#викторина_Правда
Культурный вечер «Дом Правды» для партнеров: архитектура, история и диалог о будущем Москвы
Наш закрытый культурный вечер прошел в пространстве Столешники Хаус и объединил тех, кто ценит архитектуру, историю и качественное развитие городской среды.
Концепция вечера была вдохновлена эстетикой «богатого СССР» — эпохой, когда и был построен комбинат «Правда». Атмосферу создавали тематические детали: талоны на черную и…
🥑 Вновь в новостях: на этот раз — на телеканале «Москва 24».
В эфир вышел новый репортаж о реставрации легендарного комбината газеты «Правда».
Эксперты проекта «Дом Правды» рассказали о ходе работ, ключевых этапах восстановления исторического здания и задачах, которые сегодня стоят перед реставраторами.
Смотрите полный репортаж и узнавайте больше о возрождении одного из главных памятников архитектурного авангарда …
🥳Правильный ответ — 1934 год
История этого здания началась еще в 1929 году. Фундамент здания заложили в 1932 году, а 5 мая 1934 года здесь отпечатали первый номер газеты «Правда» на новой ротационной машине.
Открытие стало событием государственного масштаба. На церемонии присутствовали Климент Ворошилов, Серго Орджоникидзе, Анастас Микоян, Михаил Калинин и Максим Литвинов — представители высшего руководства страны.…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dom_pravda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДОМ ПРАВДЫ” (@dom_pravda), 135 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dom_pravda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
