▫️ ▫️▫️▫️🔤 AoifeMolloy '👓👓👓' ▫️▫️▫️▫️––nice–– ▫️— Oh, I'm your worst nightmare, ➿bitch! — I yanked her away from ➿Joey and sent her crashing ➿▫️▫️▫️▫️onto her back. 🤩 ▫️▫️▫️ ▫️▫️▫️🔤 ClayCollins '👡👡' ▫️▫️▫️▫️––crazy–– ▫️— Oh, you!! — I strike her, and ➿she slams into the wall beside ➿the doorway. She cries out, ➿▫️▫️crumpling to the floor. 🤩 ▫️ ✨#saving6 #aoifemolloy #boysoftommen #chloewalsh #claycollins #trystsixven…

Channel
I’m ur nightmare bitch`
@dollrinx
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
315subscribers
+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003851993182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dollrinx |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 12 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dollrinx |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 315 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 317 | -30 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 347 | -31 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 378 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 366 | +128 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 238 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 239 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 239 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 125
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 56%
- Most on one post
- 26
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dollrinx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
▫️Вы чего отписываетесь, дуры. Я же не забросила канал. Я просто в депрессивно-суицидальном отпуске.😒 И вообще я не буду потом вас из чс у бота доставать. Так что фак.
Sticker, posted without a caption
КАРИНА Я ТЕБЯ ОЧЕНЬ ЛЮБЛЮ. ты у меня асоц прям с клэй,такая барби сучка,но с тем вайбом женского лакросса,украшая ракетку эту стразами и наклейками. барби,которая русалочка и занимается серфом. конечно ава нэш! возможно это удивительно,но это не только из-за вайба розового,а просто ава такая фэшн герл,но она прячется и доверяет только близким и ты бы доводила мужиков точно так же. конечно же ифа,ты бы так же пиздила…
Я уже заеб выбирать, помогайте
- Crazy-a$$-fuck Barbie doll` (клэй как клэй, нью эра¿¿)46%
- I’m ur nightmare bitch xo` (ифа как ифа, сиди не выебывайся¡¡)67%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
»▫️▫️🔤рочитанное за июль: 1️⃣🔤 Прикосновение судьбы (Кора Рейли) — 9/10 2️⃣🔤 Эффект Фостера 94% (Селина Аллен) — 10/10 ▫️ »▫️С каждым разом всё меньше..😔
▫️ ▫️▫️▫️🔤HappyBirthday '🍰' ▫️▫️▫️——princessjaeger—— ▫️➖🤩he tips of my fingers started ➿to tingle, and I can't take my eyes ➿off her mouth. She was warm ➿when I kissed her. Like good ➿coffee on a rainy morning. ➿I'd like to pull her into the bathroom, ➿hold her, andkiss her in the shower. ▫️▫️🦢 🤩'd like to see her smile. ✨I love you, my beautiful angel.🤩
▫️ ▫️➖🤩nteractive by @dollrinx. ``🏝 🤍🤩our aesthetic channel.🤍 ▫️❗️Подписка, репост на канал обязательны. Юз канал, имя + прототип. Терпение, так как вас очень много. 🧘🏼♀️ ▫️выход после результатов = вас бот в бан кидает. 🎀 Стоп
▫️ ▫️▫️▫️▫️🔤NessaHogwarts '🩰' ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️——broken—— ▫️➖ 🤩e is here. ➿He is at the bottom. My boy. ➿My little boy in the overalls ➿with the little bear that I ➿sewed for him with love. ▫️▫️▫️Now I am screaming. ▫️🤩 scream so loudly that ➿birds fly off the trees. I scream ➿so loudly that snow falls from ➿the branches. I scream so loudly ➿that perhaps the whole world can ➿hear. ▫️▫️▫️I want to die. ▫️▫️▫️I want to be wit…
▫️ ▫️▫️▫️▫️🔤OliviaJaeger '🌟' ▫️▫️▫️▫️—— bikergf—— ▫️➖🤩ain pierces my chest. I watch as ➿she pulls up to us, her black motorcycle ➿smaller and older than the others, but ➿God… I rarely get to see her outside ➿of her school uniform or lacrosse ➿gear, and I can't take my eyes off her. ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️🦢 🤩y gf🫶 ▫️ ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️id: bby ▫️ ✨#oliviajaeger #trystsixvenom #penelopedouglas 🤩
▫️ ▫️▫️▫️🔤BarbaraEvans '👝' ▫️▫️▫️——designer—— ▫️➖🤩n this life, you have to pay ➿your dues. In the ninth grade, ➿I told my father for the first time ➿that I wanted to become a fashion ➿designer — he took it as a joke. ▫️▫️🦢 🤩ome time later, I brought it up again; he tensed up but still thought I was kidding. ✨#эффектфостера #правилабарби #селинааллен🎀
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dollrinx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я уже заеб выбирать, помогайте
- Crazy-a$$-fuck Barbie doll` (клэй как клэй, нью эра¿¿)46%
- I’m ur nightmare bitch xo` (ифа как ифа, сиди не выебывайся¡¡)67%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dollrinx named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I’m ur nightmare bitch`” (@dollrinx), 315 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dollrinx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.