Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DoHodl

@dohodl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

303subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001521308968
TypeChannel
Username@dohodl
DescriptionКанал о биткоине для ходлеров С нами просто делать ходл
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dohodl

Growth

3037 Aug 2026, 09:43 — 303 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:00 — 303 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:438 Aug 2026, 08:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 302–304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:00303no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:43303first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.1%
avg views ÷ 303 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,250
Reactions total158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,750
Videos
273
Links
2,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 603274448310213387311556.9%
🔥2512.4%
🫡2110.4%
👍157.43%
😁115.45%
83.96%
👀20.99%
🤪20.99%
🌚10.495%
🎉10.495%
😢10.495%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
101
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dohodl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC76 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ИИ научился читать мысли Это технология, из за которой исследовательница из OpenAI перебежала в стартап Conduit, который в подвале в Сан-Франциско собирает данные мозговой активности Добровольцы надевают гарнитуры, усеянные сенсорами, и разговаривают с ИИ пока тот слушает как срабатывают их нейроны Сигнал настолько слабый, что команда отключила все розетки в здании от электричества, и работает от батареек, потому

🫡4🎉1👀1😢1

6 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC86 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не твои ключи (сгенерированные с использованием более 128 бит энтропии), не твои биткоины Ходл биткоин 💎 🙌 @DoHodl | BeHodler

😁5custom 60327444831021338733🫡1

3 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

OP_RETURN: директивная реклама, или мемпул Биткоина как источник новостей Крупнейший адрес атаковавшего с использованием ИИ уязвимость в аппаратном кошельке ColdCard, который содержит 562 BTC, получил пылевую транзакцию с сообщением OP_RETURN, рекламирующим услуги по отмыванию за 10% от суммы с указанием контакта в Telegram Отправитель потратил 0.002347 BTC, отправил атакующему всего 1590 сатоши и вернул остаток на

custom 60327444831021338735🫡3

2 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC150 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В конечном итоге вы должны сами хранить свои ключи и стать суверенным оператором крошечного частного банка, защищённого математикой и уровнем паранойи, обычно присущим свергнутым диктаторам Но ваша 60-летняя соседка, тётя Соня, всё ещё использует в качестве пароля от всего «Sonya1966!», а однажды отправила свой СНИЛС боту в Max под названием Всероссийский центр долголетия Для подобных мамонтов и создаются сервисы,

custom 60327444831021338738🫡2

26 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC176 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мнение: Биткоин отучает от лудомании Большинство людей тянет к азартным играм по одной простой причине Мы проводим большую часть жизни, работая за зарплату А зарплата, если задуматься, это одна из самых скучных вещей в мире Ни один мужчина с высоким уровнем тестостерона не захочет годами делать одно и то же, получать фиксированную сумму и понимать, что сколько бы сил он ни вложил, доход почти не изменится Кто-то

custom 603274448310213387393🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 05:12 UTC171 views12 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока баблоделы рассказывают тебе про «инфляционные ожидания», «перегретость экономики», либо про её «контролируемое охлаждение» в целях «сокращения отклонения экономики вверх от траектории сбалансированного роста», в мире происходит глобальное перераспределение мирового богатства в сторону владельцев децентрализованных, прозрачных и базопасных супер «звонких» денег Включай критическое мышление и холодный математиче

custom 60327444831021338738👍21🫡1

23 Jul 2026, 04:40 UTC147 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Интернет зарезервировал код ошибки 402 «Требуется оплата» еще в 1997 году, и оставил его пустым на четверть века, потому что интернету не хватало родных денег Теперь у него есть Биткоин Казалось бы, и что с того? Какой толк от IoT на кристально прозрачных, честных, «звонких» деньгах? Вот тебе пример, :username – небольшая сумма в битках, отправленная через LN (Lightning Network) за сообщение незнакомцу, и возвраща

😁6custom 60327444831021338735🔥3👍2🌚1

21 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC175 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Занимательный факт: никто не знает, сколько на самом деле существует нод сети Биткоина Видны только те, которые сами открыты для подключения, но огромное количество нод работает в «тихом» режиме, и это сделано намеренно Возможно, прямо сейчас миллионы компьютеров по всему миру хранят полную копию блокчейна, самостоятельно проверяют каждую транзакцию и каждый блок, защищая сеть без какого-либо разрешения или централ

custom 60327444831021338739🔥3👍1

18 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC212 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Каждый медвежий рынок Биткоина заканчивался на более высоком минимуме, чем предыдущий Один умник наложил на исторические минимумы прошлых циклов простую степенную модель (Bitcoin Power Law, математическую модель долгосрочного роста) Модель выдала минимумы текущего и последующих 2 циклов: • 2026 год: ~$61 тыс. • 2030 год: ~$188 тыс. • 2035 год: ~$582 тыс. Важно понимать, что это не прогноз цены, а данные статистич

custom 60327444831021338739🫡4👍2

17 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC414 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нет, это не список крипто-щиткоинов, это настоящий государственный рагпул Учитывая, что данные представлены на 14 июля, сейчас картина выглядит ещё хуже Инфографика на случай, если вы вдруг всё ещё думаете, что биткоин является скамом, а государство вам что то там гарантирует. Всё с точностью наоборот Ходл биткоинов – это надёжный работающий способ вернуть утраченную свободу и обрести гармонию, а государства – это

custom 603274448310213387311🔥6🫡3🤪2👍1

17 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC178 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С июля 2020 года четырехлетняя скользящая средняя биткоина росла со среднегодовой доходностью 47,5%... ...даже после текущей просадки, нескольких медвежек, глобального цикла повышения ставок и постоянных некрологов о крахе, Биткоин упал всего лишь на 44,8% по сравнению с прошлым годом Вместе с тем, его четырехлетняя скользящая средняя выросла на 23,3% Рынок постоянно пытается убедить нас, что самое важное происход

custom 603274448310213387372👍1

16 Jul 2026, 00:32 UTC160 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новый Биткоин майнинг-пул под названием «Parasite» начал набирать хешрейт сети Когда пул находит блок, первооткрыватель получает фиксированный бонус в 1 BTC, в то время как оставшаяся часть вознаграждения за блок в размере 2,125 BTC (плюс комиссии) распределяется между другими участниками через Lightning Network Антиказино: мини-асики, объединенные в пул, где у тебя есть гарантированный доход, а также возможность с

custom 60327444831021338738🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dohodl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 655,266 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DoHodl” (@dohodl), 303 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dohodl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.