Channel
@dogechainpumps
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001754327229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dogechainpumps |
| Description | This is a channel where we pump tokens on the dogechain & Also Share Dogechain coins which are exploding right now. LFG !! 🔥 |
| Created | 15 August 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dogechainpumps |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 57 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 57 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
45 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 28.9% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2022 to 1 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
Will DogeChain volume & hype ever gonna come back like before? Let's see what you guys think
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
DogeChain Pumps pinned Deleted message
Votes will only Count if you are a member of @DogeChainPumps ( Make sure you are joined If you are not yet) We will ape 20K WDoge to whoever wins this poll. ( Be sure to must subscribe us ) 🍿
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2
We are congratulating DogeEatDoge for winning our poll with over 70+ votes, as we said whoever wins the poll will get our 20k doge investment we have already started buying in parts. All the more necessary infos will be provided and given to their mods by us soon. All the other coins also did pretty well. Congratulations to all of them too for having such an amazing Community❤️ TG: https://t.me/DogeEatDoge_OMNOM @…
🔥13👍1
Shill your DogeChain Moonshots down below Shibes! 🍿 @Dogechainpumps
👍1
Funds ready!
👍8
VOTES WILL ONLY COUNT IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF @DogeChainPumps ( Make sure you are joined If you are not yet) We will ape 25000 WDoge to whoever wins this poll. ( Be sure to must subscribe us ) 🍿
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
‼️ ANNOUNCEMENT ‼️ We made a channel on DogeChain to as @DogeChainPumps Where we will be doing calls/pumps on the Dogechain. I'm sure you are ready for this. Make sure to join us there. We are going to do a lot of fun stuff and make good amount of money! 🍿
Welcome Everyone, Big Things in the Making. Be ready! 🐶🍿
DogeChain Pumps is the First and only official channel of DogeChain Pumps/Calls. It's made specifically for the purpose of giving you signals and pumps daily to help you make way more Xs into your portfolio. We are here and working daily to make sure to find the best gems for you. As Dogechain is pretty new and the volume is emerging, we will be a part of this revolution and will make this chain and our Channel succe…
👍18🎉1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dogechainpumps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Will DogeChain volume & hype ever gonna come back like before? Let's see what you guys think
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Votes will only Count if you are a member of @DogeChainPumps ( Make sure you are joined If you are not yet) We will ape 20K WDoge to whoever wins this poll. ( Be sure to must subscribe us ) 🍿
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
VOTES WILL ONLY COUNT IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF @DogeChainPumps ( Make sure you are joined If you are not yet) We will ape 25000 WDoge to whoever wins this poll. ( Be sure to must subscribe us ) 🍿
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2022 to 1 March 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 426,497 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DogeChain Pumps” (@dogechainpumps), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dogechainpumps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.