Channel
@doctormarry3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
188subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002302911972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doctormarry3 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doctormarry3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 188 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 183 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 183 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (22 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 711 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 43.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 7.25% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Воняет изо рта? Пора удалять!☝️ Возможно, проблема не в зубах, а в миндалинах🥺 Показаний к удалению миндалин гораздо больше, чем многие думают. И речь не только о боли в горле👉🏻 Если вас беспокоят частые ангины, постоянные простуды, длительная повышенная температура, слабость или другие симптомы, которые не проходят, не стоит гадать о причине. Такие состояния могут быть связаны с хроническим воспалением миндалин и…
❤2
🔄 Инверсия конхи ушной раковины (в международной медицинской практике — inverted concha или anteverted conchal bowl) — это редкая врожденная деформация наружного уха, при которой хрящ раковины (конхи) выгнут наружу (вперед) вместо того, чтобы иметь нормальную вогнутую форму чаши. Визуально это выглядит как выпуклый бугорок в центре уха, который полностью или частично перекрывает вход в слуховой проход. Патология но…
❤2🔥1
2 месяца после прямого лифтинга бровей. Максимально естественно, как это требует мужская пластика: ✔️Брови находятся на хорошем уровне; ✔️взгляд более свежий; ✔️больше нет эффекта грустного взгляда✨
❤2🔥2
И это неудивительно, ведь именно такая форма делает взгляд более выразительным, молодым и притягательным😍☝️ Но добиться красивого результата можно только с учетом вашей анатомии: строения век, положения наружного уголка глаза, качества тканей и пропорций лица✨🥺 Именно поэтому план операции всегда составляется индивидуально. Чтобы получить гармоничную миндалевидную форму, которая будет выглядеть естественно и подчер…
🔥2❤1
Результат первичной риносептопластики на столе. Запрос на естественный и гармоничный нос ✨
🔥5❤3
Реальная история👇 Человека могут годами не воспринимать всерьез из-за внешности😱 Один мой пациент рассказывал, что на работе его словно не видели в роли руководителя и воспринимали как безответственного. Хотя опыта, знаний и компетенции у него было более чем достаточно🥺 После отопластики отношение окружающих изменилось. Его стали воспринимать иначе, а карьера пошла вверх🌱 Детские черты лица могут незаметно влиять…
👌3❤2
Открытый взгляд - это не отдельная операция и не универсальный шаблон красоты☝️ Он зависит от анатомии: формы глаз, положения бровей, строения век, пропорций всего лица✨ Нельзя просто взять и сделать себе глаза другого человека. И, честно говоря, не всегда это вообще нужно😱🫂 Пластическая хирургия это не про копирование чужой внешности. Она должна делать человека более гармоничным, а не другим🙏🥺 Записывайтесь на к…
❤3🔥3❤🔥1
Нависшие брови и грустный взгляд - это не всегда вопрос возраста☝️ Часто такие особенности связаны с анатомией лица и активной работой определённых мышц, из-за чего лицо может выглядеть уставшим, строгим или недовольным даже в спокойном состоянии😔 Гармоничная коррекция помогает сделать взгляд более открытым, а выражение лица мягче и свежее, при этом сохраняя естественность и индивидуальность🤍✨ Для того чтобы подоб…
🔥5
Video, posted without a caption
🔥4❤2
Вы думали, что привлекательность ягодиц это просто вопрос красоты?😉На самом деле всё гораздо интереснее😌 Наш мозг считывает привлекательность тела не только с эстетической точки зрения. На протяжении тысячелетий определённые пропорции ассоциировались со здоровьем, хорошей физической формой и способностью выдерживать нагрузки☝️ Развитые ягодичные мышцы - это стабильность таза, правильная биомеханика движений, поддер…
❤6❤🔥2
Пластика подбородка — одна из самых популярных операций среди мужчин☝️😱 Она помогает сделать профиль более мужественным, подчеркнуть линию нижней челюсти и создать гармоничные пропорции лица🥰 Операция может выполняться как с помощью импланта, так и за счет коррекции собственной костной ткани выбор метода зависит от анатомических особенностей и желаемого результата😍✨ Правильно выполненная пластика подбородка не мен…
❤5🔥2😱1
Результат открытой риносептопластики с выраженной асимметрией лицевого скелета
🔥6❤2❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @doctormarry3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,188,002 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пластический хирург| ЛОР Москва” (@doctormarry3), 188 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctormarry3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.