Channel
@doctor_quvochbek
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
991subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002570614506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doctor_quvochbek |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doctor_quvochbek |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 991 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 1,001 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:48 | 1,007 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 995 | +20 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 975 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 999 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 999 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
279 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 119 | 42.7% | |
| ❤ | 90 | 32.3% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 10.8% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 8.24% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 2.87% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.358% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔎 “Barcha analizlarim yaxshi, lekin nega homilador bo‘lolmayapman?” ‼️ Bu savol ko‘plab juftliklarni o‘ylantiradi. Barcha asosiy analizlar yaxshi chiqishi homiladorlik uchun barcha omillar ham to‘liq joyida degani emas. Homiladorlikka ta’sir qiluvchi ko‘plab omillar mavjud va ayrim muammolar oddiy analizlarda aniqlanmasligi mumkin. Batafsil ma’lumotni postimizda o‘qing va o‘zingiz uchun kerakli xulosani oling. 💬 …
👍6❤1
Signed .
Video message, posted without a caption
👍17❤1
Signed Quvonchbek Uygʻunovich
📌 TESTOSTERONNI TABIIY RAVISHDA QANDAY QO‘LLAB-QUVVATLASH MUMKIN? Erkaklar salomatligi va reproduktiv salohiyatida testosteron muhim o‘rin tutadi. Uni me’yorda ushlab turish uchun quyidagi tavsiyalarga amal qiling. 🥩 1. Testosteronni qo‘llab-quvvatlovchi mahsulotlar • Mol go‘shti (me’yorida) • Tuxum • Baliq (losos, skumbriya, sardina) • Dengiz mahsulotlari (ayniqsa, ustritsa) • Qovoq urug‘i • Yong‘oq va bodom • Avo…
👍6❤3
Signed .
✨ Bugun natijalar kuni ekan… Har bir ijobiy natija ortida katta sabr, ishonch va mehnat bor. Bugun yana bir oila o’z orzusiga bir qadam yaqinlashdi 🤲🏻 Sizga ham tez orada shunday quvonchli xabar ulashishni tilayman.
❤15🙏3😢2
Signed .
🤍 Yana bir ijobiy natija! Sizlarning ishonchingiz biz uchun eng katta motivatsiya. Yana bir oila farzand sari yo’lda muhim natijaga erishdi. ✅ Navbatdagi shunday xushxabar aynan sizniki bo’lsin. Ustozim va manga raxmat uchun alohida xursand bo’ldim!
👍9❤3🥰2😢1
Signed .
Bu videoni tayyorlash men uchun oson bo‘lmadi... 💔 Har kuni farzand orzusida yurgan, yillar davomida kurashayotgan, ko‘zida umid bilan qabulimizga kirib keladigan oilalarni ko‘ramiz. Kimdir yillar davomida davolanadi, kimdir ko‘p sinovlardan o‘tadi, kimdir esa hali ham sabr bilan kutmoqda. Afsuski, shunday paytda ayrim insonlar o‘zlariga berilgan farzand ne'matining qadriga yetmaydi. Bu esa yurakni og‘ritadi. Allo…
😢20👍4😱2❤1
Signed .
“3 yil behuda vaqt yo‘qotdik…” Bir juftlik 3 yil davomida faqat ayol tekshiruvdan o‘tdi. Vitaminlar, ukollar, muolajalar… Lekin farzand bo‘lmadi. Keyin oddiy spermogramma topshirildi. Natija: erkakda muammo. Bilasizmi? Ko‘pincha sabab erkak tomonda bo‘ladi. Lekin biz hamon faqat ayollarni davolaymiz. 😊 Bunaqa vaziyatda faqat Erkakni yoki ayolni ayibdor qilish natoʻgʻri har ikalasi ham davolansa tezroq va samarali…
👍12❤3
Signed .
Hayz siklining buzilishi — organizm signalidir Ko‘pchilik hayz kechikishini yoki erta kelishini oddiy hol deb o‘ylaydi. Ammo muntazam buzilishlar ayol organizmidagi gormonal yoki boshqa muammolarning belgisi bo‘lishi mumkin. Normal hayz sikli qanday? Odatda 21–35 kun oralig‘ida keladigan, muntazam takrorlanadigan sikl normal hisoblanadi. Buzilish belgilari: ▫️ 35 kundan ko‘proq kechikish ▫️ Juda erta (21 kundan …
❤19
Signed .
✨ Har bir holat o‘ziga xos va chiroyli. Ammo eng yoqimli lahza — bu natijaga erishilgan ondir. Har bir bemorning hikoyasi, bosib o‘tgan yo‘li va kutgan umidi turlicha bo‘ladi. Ammo ularni birlashtiradigan narsa ijobiy natijaga bo‘lgan ishonchdir. 💙 Natijani ko‘rganimda ko‘zlarim quvonadi. Chunki bu ortida katta mehnat, sabr, mas’uliyat va uzoq davom etgan harakatlar yotadi. ✨ Har bir natija — mehnat, sabr va ishon…
👍10👏2❤1
Signed .
Morfologiya 1 holatida natija ✨️ Bemorimiz aprel oyida quvonchbekka kelgan ekanlar. Mana 3 oylik lecheniya ichida kattagina yuragi urib turgan homila bilan keldilar❤️ Tabriklaymiz, chin dilimdan quvondim. Niyat qilgan hammani shunday osongina suyuntirsin. Biz va shogirlarim sababchi bo'laveraylik. 😎 @fayoz_aminov
❤15👏2
Signed Quvonchbek Uygʻunovich
✅ Kunimizni shunday quvonchli natija bilan boshlash — eng yoqimli hissiyot. Azizlar, bildirayotgan ishonchingiz va e’tiboringiz uchun katta rahmat. Sizlarning baxtingizga oz bo‘lsa-da sababchi bo‘layotganim, orzuingiz sari birga qadam tashlayotganimiz men uchun eng katta mukofot 🤍 🙏🏻 Har bir ijobiy natija bizni yanada mas’uliyat bilan ishlashga va sizlar uchun bor kuchimizni berishga undaydi
🔥8👍4❤2
Signed ㅤ
Video message, posted without a caption
👍14🔥5
Signed Quvonchbek Uygʻunovich
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @doctor_quvochbek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reproduktolog_quvonchbek” (@doctor_quvochbek), 991 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctor_quvochbek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.